MedTrace Logo

Evaluation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation Using Conventional Laryngoscope Versus C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery

NCT04433884 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 86

Last updated 2020-06-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is being done to compare hemodynamic response upon endotracheal intubation using either conventional laryngoscopy with Macintosh blade versus C-Mac video laryngoscope in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting without anticipated difficult airway.

Conditions

  • Intubation Complication

Interventions

DEVICE

Endotracheal intubation using a laryngoscope

Patients will undergo intubation using 2 different types of laryngoscopes and their hemodynamic response would be recorded

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Aga Khan University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
35 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-06-07
Primary Completion
2020-12-31
Completion
2021-01-31

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04433884 on ClinicalTrials.gov