Effect of the Neck Extension on Blind Intubation Via Ambu® AuraGain™
NCT03408431 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 124
Last updated 2018-05-03
Summary
In a previous study, NCT03147469, the investigators found that the vocal cords were more easily visualized by fiberoptic bronchoscopy with neck extension positioning. On the basis of this finding, the investigators are going to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of neck extension on the success rate of blind intubation through laryngeal mask.
Participants undergoing general anesthesia will be randomly assigned to group E (with neck extension) or group C (with neutral position). Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask will be placed first, and then, a lubricated endotracheal tube will be gently intubated through the laryngeal mask. The participants will be mechanically ventilated with an endotracheal tube if blind intubation succeed. Blind intubation will be performed with a maximum of two attempts. If all attempts failed, the laryngeal mask will be removed and the tube will be intubated using a direct laryngoscopy.
The primary outcome of this study is the success rate of blind intubation within a first attempt. Secondary outcomes included overall success rate of blind intubation within a maximum of two attempts, time for blind intubation, the incidence of postoperative hoarseness, cough, and sore throat, and any obvious complications related to airway management such as bleeding, airway trauma, dental fracture, aspiration, or bronchospasm.
Conditions
- Intubation; Difficult or Failed
- Intubation Complication
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Ambu® AuraGain™
Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask will be placed first, and then, a lubricated endotracheal tube will be gently intubated through the laryngeal mask under each position according to the assigned group.
- PROCEDURE
-
neck extension
Patients' neck will be maximally extended (\~60°) during blind intubation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Seoul National University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jin-Tae Kim, PhD. · Seoul National University Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-01-25
- Primary Completion
- 2018-04-30
- Completion
- 2018-05-01
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT05347680 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel in Children
NCT03118245 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Simple Preparation of Endotracheal Tube
NCT03289767 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel Blind Intubation and I-gel Bronchoscopic Intubation During Resuscitation
NCT02411422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of the Success Rate of the Endotracheal Intubation Between the Stylet and the Frova With Acute Angled Videolaryngoscope
NCT03962374 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Cervical Injury
NCT05619965 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu Aura-i Laryngeal Mask Versus Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway for Tracheal Intubation in Adults
NCT02226211 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of the Ambu ® aScope® for Tracheal Intubation in Difficult Airways
NCT01467739 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orotracheal Intubation Using Flexible Fibro Bronchoscope With vs Without Supraglottic Device
NCT04356547 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryseal Pro LMA Versus Ambu Aura Gain LMA in Elective Ophthalmological Surgeries
NCT06140667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of a Single Use (Ambu aScope) and a Reusable Flexible Optical Scope for Intubation Through a Supraglottic Airway Device (Aura-i)
NCT02002364 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Learning Direct Laryngoscopy Using a McGrath Video Laryngoscope as Direct Versus Indirect Laryngoscope
NCT03471975 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu AuraOnce Versus Ambu AuraGain LM in Children
NCT02811042 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance and Safety of the Ambu®AuraGainTM Laryngeal Mask in Children Undergoing Surgery in the Supine and Prone Position - A Prospective, Noninferiority Clinical Trial
NCT05286021 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing the Efficiency of Three Third-generation Supraglottic Airways as an Intubation Route
NCT02975466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AMBU AScope2 Fiberoptic Intubation Versus Fastrach Intubating LMA
NCT01656967 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ambu Auragain and I-Gel Supraglottic Airways in Adult Patients at an Ambulatory Surgery Center
NCT04286581 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu®AuraGain™ Versus I-gel® in Obese Patients
NCT03110393 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Thermosoftening of Double-lumen Tube for Airway Exchanger Catheter
NCT03846713 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predictive Factors for Successful Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Without Stylet
NCT05968781 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
NCT02769221 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing the Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT02856672 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation: Video Laryngoscope vs Rigid Video Stylet
NCT03120546 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AuraGain and iGel Crossover Comparison
NCT02644837 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Between Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway and Ambu® AuraGain™
NCT03130413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA