MedTrace Logo

Comparison of iLTS-D® and ILMA® for Intubation With Fiberoptic Control

NCT02922595 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 198

Last updated 2019-09-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare with a non-inferiority randomised study the new laryngeal tube (Intubating Laryngeal Tube Single-Disposable - iLTS-D) to the well-established Intubating Larygeal Mask Airway (ILMA/ Fastrach) for the success rate and time for intubation under fiberoptic control. Secondary purposes are success rates and times for ventilation for both devices and finally success rate of gastric tube placement.

Conditions

  • Intubation; Difficult

Interventions

DEVICE

Intubation through ILMA®

It will be placed into patient's larynx through the mouth in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations by experienced airway providers. Intubation will then be peformed

DEVICE

Intubation through ILTS®

It will be placed into patient's larynx through the mouth in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations by experienced airway providers. Intubation will then be peformed

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Patrick Schoettker,MD PD

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • patrick Schoettker, Professor · University Hospital Lausanne CHUV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-09-30
Primary Completion
2019-09-30
Completion
2019-09-30

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02922595 on ClinicalTrials.gov