Comparison of Flex-It Stylet to Malleable Stylet for GlideScope Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT00771628 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2009-07-14
Summary
Patients presenting for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation will be randomized to one of two different ETT stylets. The primary outcome is time to intubation.
The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference.
The GlideScope video laryngoscope (Verathon) is a widely used intubating device that uses a high-resolution camera embedded into a plastic laryngoscope blade. An LED provides illumination. The GlideScope often provides a good laryngoscopic view, but passing the endotracheal tube (ETT) through the vocal cords is sometimes difficult. Because of the 60 degree anterior curvature of the GlideScope's blade, ETT's must have stylets inserted so that the ETT distal tip can be positioned anteriorly. Various authors have recommended different angles of the ETT to optimally place it into the trachea, including matching the GlideScope's 60 degree angle, or configuring the ETT with a 90 degree bend. Previous studies demonstrated that 90 degree sharp bend was both faster and subjectively easier in a heterogeneous group of intubators. With the introduction of the Flex-It stylet by Parker Medical, the question arises as to the the best configuration of stylet for the ETT. Therefore, this prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial is proposed.
Conditions
- Intubation
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Flex-It Stylet
Patients will be intubated using the GlideScope with an ETT fitted with a Flex-It stylet.
- DEVICE
-
Standard malleable stylet
Patients will be intubated using the GlideScope with an ETT fitted with a standard malleable stylet.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
London Health Sciences Centre
collaborator OTHER -
Unity Health Toronto
collaborator OTHER -
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Timothy P Turkstra, MD · Western University, Canada
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2008-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2008-12-31
- Completion
- 2008-12-31
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT04701762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Tip Bougie Vs Tube with Stylet for Intubation with a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU (VIDEOL-FLEXTIP)
NCT05429112 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Simultaneous Endotracheal Tube Insertion With GlideScope Use
NCT02787629 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endotrol-tracheal Tube Assisted Endotracheal Intubation During Video Laryngoscopy
NCT01099969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GlideRite® Rigid Stylet Versus Parker Flex-It Stylet
NCT02439606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Versus Flexible Tip Bougie for Videolaryngoscopy
NCT04973176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
NCT02769221 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Early Endotracheal Tube Insertion With GlideScope Use
NCT01564082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-inferiority Trial Comparing visionPRO to Glidescope Video Laryngoscopes
NCT06676462 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Lighted Stylet and GlideScope for Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation
NCT03514745 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of First Attempt Success in Nasotracheal Intubation Using Macintosh Videolaryngoscope vs. Flexible Bronchoscope
NCT06964295 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Double-lumen Tube Intubation Between Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy and Video Laryngoscope
NCT07241208 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Does the Use of the GlideRite® Endotracheal Tube in Combination With the I-gel® Improve Intubation Success Rate?
NCT01265862 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy.
NCT05429125 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscope Versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for the Awake Intubation
NCT02169232 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy With Rigid Stylet vs Video Laryngoscopy With the TCI Articulating Introducer for Endotracheal Intubation in Simulated Difficult Airways
NCT06115694 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Intubation Conditions Between the Gliderite and the S-Guide
NCT02519647 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Using a VLS Using GlideRite Stylet Versus TCI Articulating Introducer in Predictive Difficult Intubation
NCT04866472 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
NCT00400972 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT01814176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Lightwand Intubation Versus Video-laryngoscope Guided Lightwand Intubation in Simulated Cervical Spine-immobilized Patients
NCT03169556 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
C-MAC Video Stylet vs. Video Endoscope
NCT03749837 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Rate of Successful Intubation and the Required Time for Intubation, Using Vie Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope Will be Compared, in Order to Evaluate the Efficacy of Vie Scope in Comparison With Macintosh in Expected Easy Airways.
NCT06149338 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison of the Success Rate of the Endotracheal Intubation Between the Stylet and the Frova With Acute Angled Videolaryngoscope
NCT03962374 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Parker Flex-it Stylet Versus Malleable Stylet in Orotracheal Intubation Using a Fiber-optic Laryngoscope
NCT04857190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA