Videolaryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation
NCT02897518 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 45
Last updated 2017-01-05
Summary
The primary end point of this study is the feasibility of intubation. The secondary end-points are the success to intubate in the first attempt, the intubation time, the Cormack and Lehane score view, the comparison of the intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score and the need for maneuvers to aid the endotracheal intubation comparing Imago V-Blade ® and Glidescope®.
Patients admit to the operation rooms of University of Naples "Federico II" and requiring endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia will be consecutively screened for the presence of predicted difficult airway according Italian guideline. According to this guideline, the presence of one or more of the following parameters may be considered highly predictive of difficult intubation: Mallampati class 3-4, inter-incisor distance \< 30 mm, mental-thyroidal distance \< 60 mm, large prominence of superior incisors above inferior incisors uncorrectable with jaw-thrust, reduced head and neck motility, and reduced mental-jugular distance. Patients matching more then 1 of the previous criteria stated by Italian guideline will be included in this case controlled study. Patients 1) without criteria for predicted difficult airway; 2) those requiring emergency surgery; 3) aged \< 18 years; or 4) declined consent to participate, will be excluded from this study.The primary end-point was the comparison of the intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score. The secondary end-points were the learning curve, the intubation time, the Cormack and Lehane score view, and the need for maneuvers to aid the endotracheal intubation comparing different videolaryngoscopes available in our department. Two anesthesiologists with 10 years of experience in conventional endotracheal intubation and trained for video assisted intubation will perform the maneuvers.
Conditions
- Airway Management
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Imago V-Balde
the endotracheal intubation will be performed with videolaryngoscopes (imago V-Blade) according to the user manual
- DEVICE
-
Glidescope
the endotracheal intubation will be performed with videolaryngoscopes (Glidescope) according to the user manual
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Federico II University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 77 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-01-31
- Completion
- 2016-01-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Place of the Video-laryngoscope in Learning Intubation by Simulation
NCT05859542 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Difficult Intubation With Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
NCT01789034 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Intubating Laryngeal Mask vs Direct Laryngoscopy: a Crossover Randomized Controlled Preterm Manikin Trial
NCT06263790 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT01814176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.
NCT03230422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does the Use of a Videolaryngoscope Modifies Anesthetic Induction ?
NCT02245789 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Applied Forces During Neonatal Intubation
NCT05197868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management
NCT01914523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
GlideScope® vs GlideScope® + aScope® for Managing Difficult Airways.
NCT02627755 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation of a Pediatric Manikin in Difficult Airway by Novice Personnel: A Comparison of Glidescope and Airtraq
NCT02290249 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Simultaneous Endotracheal Tube Insertion With GlideScope Use
NCT02787629 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope and VS-CMAC Fiberoptic Stylet for Awake Endoscopic Intubation in Predicted Difficult Airways
NCT04532138 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Digital Intubation (Two-finger) and Video Laryngoscopy
NCT04414839 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laringoscopy for Residents Intubation Study
NCT06842082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GlideScope Versus Direct Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation
NCT01235065 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Indirect Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
NCT00910156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Lighted Stylet and GlideScope for Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation
NCT03514745 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation
NCT04759300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope
NCT01683526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Head and Neck Pathology
NCT03265938 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Conventional GlideScope to Single-Use GlideScope Cobalt for Orotracheal Intubation
NCT00459797 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airway
NCT02640196 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades
NCT04948294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GlideScope®Video Laryngoscope for Difficult Intubation: Implication of the Size of Blade
NCT01616771 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Using Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Versus Flexible Intubation Video Endoscope (FIVE) in Obese Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03423563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA