MedTrace Logo

ILMA Fastrach Versus I-gel for Fiberoptic Tracheal Intubation

NCT00888875 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 240

Last updated 2014-03-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

We evaluate feasibility of fiberoptic intubation through the "ILMA Fastrach" vs the "i-gel". Both are airway devices to be introduced in the mouth we the possibility to ventilate the patient and furthermore to be a guide to introduce a tracheal tube. We first insert either the ILMA or the i-gel. In a second step, we will introduce a tube through the device, all guided visually through a fiberoptic tool which works as a railroad for the tracheal tube.

Conditions

  • Tracheal Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

i-gel

insertion after induction of anaesthesia. Afterwards, intubation over the device fiberoptically

DEVICE

ILMA

Insertion after Induction. Insertion of tracheal tube over device

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Robert Greif, M.D. · Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital Berne, Switzerland

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-07-31
Primary Completion
2010-04-30
Completion
2010-05-31

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00888875 on ClinicalTrials.gov