Impact of Low Dose Fluoroscopy in Ureteroscopy
NCT02704949 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 94
Last updated 2021-09-29
Summary
One of the most effective strategies to decrease radiation exposure during ureteroscopy is to use low dose. However, the quality of the image obtained is inferior to full dose image. The main concern is to maintain the stone free and complication rate despite the inferior quality of image obtained. Our aim was to evaluate if reducing the dose of fluoroscopy to ¼ instead of full dose would impact in a reduction of total radiation exposure despite a possible increase in fluoroscopy time. Also, if this strategy would impact in operation time, stone free rate and complication rate of unilateral semi-rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stone treatment due too less than optimal fluoroscopy image. All patients over 18 years old diagnosed with ureteral stone from 5 mm to 20 mm in diameter by CT scan were counseled regarding their treatment options. Patients who failed spontaneous passage or medical treatment or chose endourologic treatment were included in this study. Patients with abnormal urinary anatomy such as horseshoe kidney, pelvic kidney or duplex system were excluded from the study.
Conditions
- Ureteral Stone
Interventions
- RADIATION
-
1/4 fluoroscopy dose
Use of 1/4 fluoroscopy dose while ureteroscopy is being performed
- RADIATION
-
Full-dose
Use of full fluoroscopy dose while ureteroscopy is being performed
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Alexandre Danilovic, MD · University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2018-05-31
- Completion
- 2018-05-31
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Management of Ureteral Calculi Using Ultrasound Guidance: A Radiation Free Approach
NCT01792765 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Total Nephrectomy on Patients With Kidney Stone
NCT01235104 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison Between Two Shock Wave Regimens for Treating Urinary Stones
NCT01222325 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Fluoroscopy-free Technique During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05269108 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Temperature Profiles During Laser Activation in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
NCT05677425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Silent Ureteral Stone: Impact on Renal Function and Kidney Anatomy
NCT01884870 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Ureteroscopy and Ureteric Stones
NCT03404986 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
US-Non Contrast Computed Tomography Real-time Fusion for Urinary Stones Follow up
NCT02539004 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT02658942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Renal Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03795532 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Hypocaloric Diet on Urinary Lithogenic Factors of Obese Patients With Kidney Stones
NCT02690662 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Renal Anatomy on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes for Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT01589484 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preoperative Prediction of Flexible Ureteroscopy Outcome in the Treatment of Renal Calculi
NCT05857501 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Newly Reported (0-90°) Versus (0-30°) Biplanar Fluoroscopic Puncture Technique in PCNL
NCT04557722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alpha-Blockers Prior to Ureteral Access Sheath Placement in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Randomized Prospective Study
NCT07124299 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultraslow Full-power SWL Versus Slow Power-ramping SWL in Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03763539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Optimal Drainage After Flexible Ureterorenoscopy; Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life Through a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04643145 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Versus Deferred Ureteroscopy for Calculus Anuria in Children
NCT04980079 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA