Impact of Renal Anatomy on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes for Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT01589484 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 104
Last updated 2015-01-07
Summary
Kidney stone disease affects almost 10% of overall population, often requiring a surgical intervention. Currently, shock wave lithotripsy is considered a first-line treatment option for patients suffering from symptomatic kidney stones smaller than 2.0 cm, providing reasonable stone-free rate. Actually, the outcomes from SWL vary largely due to several factors including stone burden, stone density, stone-skin distance (SSD), and patient's body habitus. Furthermore, the imaging exam modality (i.e. ultrasound versus computed tomography scan) performed to assess the presence of residual fragments also impacts on SWL outcome analysis.
We aim to perform a well-controlled prospective evaluation of all variables that may impact on fragmentation and clearance of lower pole calculi after SWL. These variables are assessed exclusively by a noncontrast computed tomography scan (NCCT), eliminating the necessity of an intravenous urography to study renal collecting system anatomy; an imaging exam that is not routinely performed anymore for kidney stone patients.
Conditions
- Urolithiasis
- Urinary Lithiasis
- Kidney Calculi
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
SWL - Compact Delta Dornier Med Tech
All patients will be submitted to a noncontrast computed tomography before to SWL. Patients will be submitted to SWL under the following conditions: outpatient, general anesthesia, 3000 impulses, rate of 90/min, discharged from hospital in the same day with alpha-blocker (doxazosin) during 30 days.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Sao Paulo
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Fabio CM Torricelli, MD · University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2014-08-31
- Completion
- 2014-12-31
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
(SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone
NCT03388060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Total Nephrectomy on Patients With Kidney Stone
NCT01235104 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones
NCT02037906 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Under Selective, General Anesthesia.
NCT01008267 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effects of the Use of Adjuvant Drugs After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Renal Calculus
NCT01215708 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types
NCT06144372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Narrow Versus Wide Focal Zones for Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi
NCT01226875 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Alternating Bidirectional Versus The Standard Approach During Shock Wave Lithotripsy For Renal And Upper Lumbar Ureteric Stones
NCT03243682 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm
NCT06120257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Silent Ureteral Stone: Impact on Renal Function and Kidney Anatomy
NCT01884870 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Combined ESWL and ODT as Non-Invasive Modalities for Treating Small and Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
NCT06814834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL for Distal Ureteric Stone: Supine Versus Prone
NCT02298465 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Imaging of Kidney Stones and Lithotripsy
NCT02214836 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Renal Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03795532 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multi-Center Comparison of Dual Lumen Versus Single Lumen Ureteroscopes
NCT02123082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-CT vs Ellipsoid for JJ Stent Prediction Before ESWL
NCT07337954 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy on Hypertension
NCT03714477 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal and Upper Ureteral Stones in Adults Under Locally Infiltrate d Anaesthetics ; a Clinical Randomized Controlled Study
NCT06462573 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT00873054 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones
NCT04346134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA