Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Unimodal Bilateral Flexible Ureteroscopy.
NCT05591716 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 86
Last updated 2022-11-16
Summary
This is a prospective controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of two methods of flexible urethroscopy in patients with urolithiasis, as well as the effect of surgery on quality of life.
Conditions
- Kidney Stone
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Bilateral same-session flexible ureterorenoscopy
The patient was in the lithotomic position. A semi-rigid ureteroscope was passed into the bladder, then a roadrunner was placed. A flexible urethroscope is guided along the roadrunner to the kidney. In the kidney, the concrement is fragmented with laser energy. The fragments were extracted using a basket. Then a revision of the kidney is performed using a flexible urethroscope. A ureteral stent was placed in the pelvis.The ureteroscope was extracted together with the case with the ureteral revision: there was no damage to the ureter.Next, this procedure is performed from the other side. Urine was excreted from the bladder using a Nelaton catheter.
- PROCEDURE
-
Unilateral same-session flexible ureterorenoscopy
The patient was in the lithotomic position. A semi-rigid ureteroscope was passed into the bladder, then a roadrunner was placed. A flexible urethroscope is guided along the roadrunner to the kidney. In the kidney, the concrement is fragmented with laser energy. The fragments were extracted using a basket. Then a revision of the kidney is performed using a flexible urethroscope. A ureteral stent was placed in the pelvis. The ureteroscope was extracted together with the body with revision of the ureter: there was no damage to the ureter. Urine was excreted from the bladder using a Nelaton catheter.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Nariman Gadjiev, PhD · Saint Petersburg State University Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-10-17
- Primary Completion
- 2023-02-17
- Completion
- 2023-05-17
Countries
- Russia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ureteroscopy Combined With Negative Pressure Sheath Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT06938113 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Ureteral Stenting After Ureteroscopy for Stone Treatment, A Global Perspective on Indications and Outcomes
NCT03567421 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Fluoroscopic Guided vs US-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy for the Treatment of Stone Disease
NCT04606758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Management of Staghorn Stones
NCT07322471 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Single Use Flexible Ureteroscopes in Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT04578795 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy For the Treatment of Proximal Ureteric Stone
NCT04851171 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Without Reverse Insertion of a Ureteral Catheter
NCT05574517 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure
NCT02734914 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Flexible Cystoscopy in Laparoscopic Stone Surgery
NCT01277198 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
NCT02751281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Standard Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones
NCT06660914 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stent Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy in Acutely Obstructed Infected Kidney
NCT03498794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Drainage by PCN vs. JJ in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructive Kidney Disease Caused by Urolithiasis
NCT04594161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible vs Semi-rigid URS
NCT07247617 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery
NCT02625051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA