Comparison of Fiberoptic Intubation With Fiberoptic Intubation Through an Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Infants and Small Children

NCT01876940 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2013-07-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this prospective randomized study is to compare the effect of operator experience on the ability to use fiberoptic-guided intubation in children less than two years old, with and without the use of an air-Q as a conduit. The question the investigators are trying to answer is: Does the operator experience make a significant difference in the time for successful fiberoptic guided tracheal intubation with and without the use of an air-Q intubating laryngeal airway?

Conditions

  • Fiberoptic Intubation in Children

Interventions

DEVICE

air-Q, followed by fiberoptic intubation

DEVICE

Free-hand Fiberoptic Intubation

Fiberoptic tracheal intubation will be performed without use of the air-Q and timed. Laryngeal grade of view will also be assessed

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Narasimhan Jagannathan, MD · Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

  • Lisa Sohn, MD · Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Day
Max Age
2 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-06-30
Primary Completion
2013-07-31
Completion
2013-07-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01876940 on ClinicalTrials.gov