Comparison Study of the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope With the King Vision

NCT02316769 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 66

Last updated 2017-03-10

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

In this study, the investigators compare the effectiveness of two relatively new video laryngoscopes, McGrath MAC (Covidien, Dublin Ireland) and the King Vision (King Systems, Noblesville, IN), by practitioners experienced in airway management but with limited exposure to these two devices. Our hypothesis was that, the McGrath MAC device would require fewer intubation attempts and shorter intubation times than the King Vision when performed by novice users.

Conditions

  • Video Laryngoscopic Device Usage in Novice Users

Interventions

PROCEDURE

King Vision video laryngoscope

Patient intubated with the King Vision Video Laryngoscope

PROCEDURE

McGrath MAC video laryngoscope

Intubation with the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Bret Alvis · Vanderbilt University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-08-31
Primary Completion
2013-05-31
Completion
2013-05-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02316769 on ClinicalTrials.gov