MedTrace Logo

Macintosh Versus Macgrath for Laryngoscopy in COVID 19 Hypoxemic ICU Patients

NCT04956913 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2021-07-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this comparative prospective study, we aim to compare the classic Macintosh laryngoscope and the Mac Grath videolaryncoscope in ICU covid 19 patients recruiting intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation.

patients meeting inclusion criteria were randomized in 2 groups: MacGrath and Macintosh.

we collected anthropometric and intubation data among all patients, and the 2 groups were compared regarding the time for intubation, the need of alternative techniques to intubate and the impact on the oxygenation by recording the lowest SPO2.

Conditions

  • COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Interventions

DEVICE

Mac Grath

Patients of this group were intubated using Mac Gath videolaryngoscope

DEVICE

Macintosh

Patients of this group were intubated using the Macintosh Laryngoscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mongi Slim Hospital

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-08-01
Primary Completion
2021-12-31
Completion
2022-01-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04956913 on ClinicalTrials.gov