Uphold Versus Robotic Surgery for Pelvic Prolapse Repair: A Decision Analytic Approach

NCT01611285 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2017-06-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Within the general objective of investigating optimal medical techniques for pelvic prolapse repair, this study proposes to: (1) test the hypothesis that the UPHOLD procedure is more cost effective than robotic surgery for pelvic prolapse repair (2)using formal decision analysis as the comparative strategy

Conditions

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Boston Scientific Corporation

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Atlantic Health System

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Patrick Culligan, MD FACOG FACS · Atlantic Health System

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-11-30
Primary Completion
2011-07-31
Completion
2011-08-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01611285 on ClinicalTrials.gov