Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Acellular Collagen Biomesh (Pelvisoft) to Polypropylene Mesh(Pelvitex) for Sacral Colpopexy
NCT00564083 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2011-03-22
Summary
This research protocol is a randomized controlled trial. It is being done to compare and find out the relative differences between the materials, (Pelivisoft) "natural organic mesh" to poly propylene mesh (Pelvitex) "manmade mesh" after a surgery known as sacral colpopexy. This surgery involves supporting the prolapsed vaginal wall with a piece of material (known as a graft) attached to a ligament along your backbone (or sacrum). These materials are both FDA approved and widely used. The following objectives: anatomic outcomes, graft-related complications between the two materials, changes in pelvic organ prolapse-related quality of life, subjective changes in sexual function,changes in bowel function and the prolapse related pain present after sacral colpopexy will be evaluated.
The study visits are all under standard of care. Study questionnaires are unique to the study and will be completed at the enrollment in hospital, 2, 6,12 weeks, 6 months and one year visits The questionnaires are related to bowel function, bladder function, prolapse and sexual activity.
Permission will be requested to contact the patient again 5 years after surgery. Contact in the future will in no way obligate the patient to participate.
There may or may not be direct medical benefits to the participant. Decreased risk of erosion may be a possible benefit if placed in the organic "natural" arm of the study. The information learned from this study may benefit other patients in the future
Conditions
- Uterine Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
sacral colpopexy
This surgery involves supporting the prolapsed vaginal wall with a piece of material (known as a graft) attached to a ligament along your backbone (or sacrum)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Atlantic Health System
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Patrick Culligan, MD · Atlantic Health Urogynecology
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- FACTORIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2005-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2010-03-31
- Completion
- 2010-06-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prospective Cohort Study of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using MPATHY Restorelle Mesh
NCT01320618 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03681223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biological OviTex Versus Synthetic Graft in Robotic Prolapse Surgery
NCT06430931 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
NCT00372190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpexy Versus Lateral Suspension
NCT03582852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
NCT00557882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Modified Ischial Spinous Fascia Fixation and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418451 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT05420831 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy Using Alyte Mesh
NCT01320644 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00551993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Success Rate of Transvaginal Mesh for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: The Extended RCT Study
NCT05938881 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh
NCT00676000 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Smartmesh Technology in Pelvic Floor Repair Procedures
NCT03098641 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction
NCT03457883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial to Determine Which of Two Surgical Techniques Works Better to Correct Vaginal Bulging
NCT00988975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
NCT00475540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment To Greater Anterior Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00676325 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of the Total Vaginal Mesh Technique for Treatment of Genital Prolapse
NCT00196495 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
NCT02272361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RCT for Transvaginal Self-cut Mesh vs Mesh-kit for Severe POP
NCT03849157 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Splentis for the Treatment of Primary Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05042453 ·Status: RECRUITING