Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Versus POPS in the Management of Pelvic Prolapse

NCT02911584 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2017-12-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is the first study comparing the laparoscopic sacropexy with Pelvic Organs Prolapse Suspension (POPS) to treat pelvic organ prolapse. This prospective randomized surgical trial is designed to test the clinical and functional effects of the two different laparoscopic procedures in terms of anatomical correction of the prolapse, post-operative and long term morbidity, rate of recurrence and subjective satisfaction of the patient evaluated by a quality of life questionnaire.

Conditions

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic procedure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Miulli General Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
30 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-10-31
Primary Completion
2017-05-31
Completion
2017-09-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02911584 on ClinicalTrials.gov