MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of the Flex-it® to the GlideRite® Stylet for GlideScope® in Simulated Difficult Intubations.

NCT02177240 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2014-06-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the Flex-it® Articulating Stylet or the GlideRite® Rigid Stylet is more effective and less traumatic in the context of difficult GlideScope® intubations.

Conditions

  • Difficult Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

GlideScope® intubation with Flex-it® stylet

GlideScope® intubation with Flex-it® stylet of a simulated difficult airway

DEVICE

GlideScope® intubation with GRS® stylet

GlideScope® intubation with GRS® stylet of a simulated difficult airway

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • John Viet Nguyen, MD · HMR

  • Issam Tanoubi, MD · HMR

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-05-31
Primary Completion
2014-09-30
Completion
2014-09-30

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02177240 on ClinicalTrials.gov