Examining the Ease of Intubation Using the Parker Flex-Tip® or a Standard Endotracheal Tube
NCT01263873 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2014-12-17
Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine if there are differences related to ease of intubation reported by clinicians who use the Parker Flex-Tip® endotracheal tubes(ETT)compared to the standard Mallinckrodt® (ETT). The problem is two (ETTs), the Parker Flex-Tip® and the Mallinckrodt®, are currently available for use in operative suites for intubation, but few studies have compared these devices with each other. Two research questions to be answered in the study are 1. Is there a difference in the ease of intubation when the Parker Flex-Tip® (ETT) is used when compared to the standard Mallinckrodt® (ETT)? and 2. Are there differences in the number of successful intubations when comparing the Parker Flex-Tip® (ETT) and the standard Mallinckrodt® (ETT)? The hypotheses are the use of the Parker Flex-Tip® (ETT) will demonstrate: 1. Fewer seconds to intubate the trachea. 2. Higher self-reported ease of placement scores and 3. Fewer redirections to intubate the trachea. The number of successful intubations is expected to be the same in both arms of the study.
Conditions
- Larynx
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Mallinckrodt (ETT)
7.0 millimeter internal diameter for female 8.0 millimeter internal diameter for male
- DEVICE
-
Parker Flex-Tip (ETT)
7.0 millimeter internal diameter for female 8.0 millimeter internal diameter for male
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Brian P Radesic, DNP, CRNA · University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2011-05-31
- Completion
- 2011-05-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Using a VLS Using GlideRite Stylet Versus TCI Articulating Introducer in Predictive Difficult Intubation
NCT04866472 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Early Endotracheal Tube Insertion With GlideScope Use
NCT01564082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Parker Flex-it Stylet Versus Malleable Stylet in Orotracheal Intubation Using a Fiber-optic Laryngoscope
NCT04857190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Simultaneous Endotracheal Tube Insertion With GlideScope Use
NCT02787629 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Lighted Stylet and GlideScope for Double-lumen Endobronchial Intubation
NCT03514745 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
NCT02769221 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy With Rigid Stylet vs Video Laryngoscopy With the TCI Articulating Introducer for Endotracheal Intubation in Simulated Difficult Airways
NCT06115694 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
GlideRite® Rigid Stylet Versus Parker Flex-It Stylet
NCT02439606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GlideScope Video Laryngoscope Versus Fiberoptic Intubation
NCT01091948 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Glidescope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubation
NCT01404780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nasal Intubation Using a Parker Flex-tip Endotracheal Tube Compared to a Nasal RAE Tube
NCT02315677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath Mac Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Critical Care Unit
NCT02413723 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Miller Straight Blade vs Macintosh Blade
NCT02664532 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Double Lumen Tube Placement Techniques
NCT02495259 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT04701762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GlideScope® vs GlideScope® + aScope® for Managing Difficult Airways.
NCT02627755 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngeal Morbidity After Endotracheal Intubation - Endoflex-tube Versus Use of Stylet
NCT00953433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Flexible Intubating Stylet in the Accurate Placement of Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube
NCT02364622 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study of a New Fiberoptic Intubation Device to Standard Intubation Techniques
NCT00906932 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Does the Use of the GlideRite® Endotracheal Tube in Combination With the I-gel® Improve Intubation Success Rate?
NCT01265862 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of the Airway Devices
NCT00581386 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy.
NCT05429125 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Long Endotracheal Tube vs. Aintree Intubating Catheter for Fiberoptic-guided Intubation in Manikin
NCT03645174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT01814176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Tip Bougie Vs Tube with Stylet for Intubation with a Videolaryngoscopy in ICU (VIDEOL-FLEXTIP)
NCT05429112 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA