A Comparison of Two Techniques for Choosing the Best Place to Put a Pacing Lead for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
NCT02061241 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2015-10-20
Summary
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BiVP) is established as an effective treatment for heart failure. Unfortunately up to 45% of patients do not respond, with no improvement in symptoms or cardiac size. Reducing the proportion of non-responders has become the key research focus in CRT.
Targeting the position of the left ventricular (LV) pacing lead within the coronary vein network has previously been shown to increase the proportion of responders to CRT. Several techniques have been tried for targeting lead position, of which the best investigated are the use of speckle-tracking echocardiography to target the lead position to the site of latest mechanical activation of the left ventricle, and the use of invasive monitoring to select the pacing site at which the greatest acute haemodynamic response (AHR) to BiVP occurs. Both techniques are limited by groups of patients in whom the techniques are not possible or provide limited useful information.
The relationship between these two measures is unknown - there are no previous studies that have investigated correlation between the site of latest mechanical activation determined by echo and the site of maximal AHR. It is likely that a hybrid technique using both of these investigations might allow optimal lead positioning in more patients, or that if the information is shown to be equivalent, more streamlined techniques can be designed.
This study will also be able to contribute towards several important secondary questions. In particular the investigators will study the possibility of using non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) to assess haemodynamic response rather than an intravascular pressure monitor wire. The investigators also wish to assess whether the site of latest mechanical activation is changed by right ventricular pacing.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Pacing in vein at site of latest mechanical activation
Pacing in vein at site of latest mechanical activation
- PROCEDURE
-
Pacing in other suitable vein
Pacing in other suitable vein
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Tim R Betts, MBChB, MD · Oxford University Hospitals
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2015-03-31
- Completion
- 2015-10-31
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes and Ventricular Remodeling in Biventricular CRT Nonresponders
NCT05760924 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Left Ventricular Lead Positioning During Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy; Comparison of Two Methods of Targeting
NCT03769272 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement
NCT01417624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) and Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD) Therapy
NCT02083419 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effects of Left Ventricular Pacing Optimilization on Cardiac Perfusion, Contractile Force, and Clinical Performance in Patients With Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure
NCT00551681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ConTempoRary Cardiac Stimulation in Clinical practicE: lEft, BivEntriculAr, Right, and conDuction System Pacing
NCT06324682 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT07069738 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Electrophysiological Optimization of Left Ventricular Lead Placement in CRT
NCT02346097 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT04110431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CRT In Narrow QRS Heart Failure: Mechanistic Insights From Cardiac MRI And Electroanatomical Mapping
NCT03258060 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of His-Ventricular (HV) Interval Optimisation in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
NCT02748876 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tailoring Pacemaker Output to Physiology in Chronic Heart Failure
NCT03781427 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Resynchronization in Paced Heart Failure Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Indication
NCT01415024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of Previously Right Ventricular Paced Heart Failure Patients
NCT01466621 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of Targeting Left Ventricular Lead Position on the Rate of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
NCT00399594 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
MultiPoint Pacing Programming Guided by Noninvasive Hemodynamics
NCT02064751 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
B-Left HF: Biventricular Versus Left Univentricular Pacing With Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) Back-Up in Heart Failure Patients
NCT00187213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Revisit the Value of Imaging in Best Using CArdiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT02528032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Triple-site Biventricular Stimulation in the Optimization of CRT
NCT02350842 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PRISM Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT01429753 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Pressure Wire Guided Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
NCT01464502 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Empiric Versus Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01323686 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stimulus Intensity in Left Ventricular Leads
NCT01060449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimizing CRT With ECGI
NCT03492788 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Myocardial Work and Metabolism in CRT
NCT02537782 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA