Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes and Ventricular Remodeling in Biventricular CRT Nonresponders
NCT05760924 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2024-11-22
Summary
Heart failure (HF) is the most common nosology encountered in clinical practice. Its incidence and prevalence increase exponentially with increasing age and it is associated with the increased mortality, more frequent hospitalization and decreased quality of life. An initial approach to the treatment of HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function and left bundle branch block (LBBB) was implantation of device for cardiac resynchronization therapy using biventricular pacing. This has resulted in long-term clinical benefits such as improved quality of life, increased functional capacity, reduced HF hospitalizations and overall mortality. However, conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in only 70% of patients. And the remaining 30% of patients are non-responders to conventional CRT. Cardiac conduction system pacing is currently a promising technique for these patients. Particularly, His bundle pacing (HBP) has been developed to achieve the same results. According to other studies HBP has shown greater improvement in hemodynamic parameters comparing with conventional biventricular CRT. But, nevertheless, there are significant clinical troubles with HBP, especially high pacing threshold. In this regard, in 2017, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) was developed, which demonstrated clinical advantages compared to conventional biventricular CRT. Also, since 2019, left bundle branch pacing-optimized CRT (LBBPO CRT) has been used in clinical practice. These methods have become an alternative to HBP due to the stimulation of LBB outside the blocking site, a stable pacing threshold and a narrow QRS complex duration on electrocardiogram. A series of case reports and observational studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of LBBP and LBBPO CRT in patients with CRT indications. However, it is not enough data about impact of CRT with LBBP and combined CRT with LBBP and LV pacing on myocardial remodeling, reducing mortality and complications. According to our hypothesis, CRT with LBBP and combined CRT with LBBP and LV pacing compared with conventional biventricular pacing will significantly improve the clinical outcomes and reverse myocardial remodeling in patients who are non-responders to biventricular CRT with HF, reduced LV ejection fraction and with indications to CRT devices with defibrillator function (CRT-D) or one of the CRT-D leads replacement.
Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Left Bundle-Branch Block
- Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
- Non-ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
- Left Ventricular Dysfunction
- Left Ventricle Remodeling
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices with Defibrillator Function (CRT-D) or CRT-D Leads Replacement
The local anesthesia will be performed on the left/right subclavian area after prepping the skin. The device pocket will be opened, the old CRT-D will be removed and disconnected from the leads. The pacing threshold, intracardiac signal amplitude and impedance (pacing and shock) on the atrial, defibrillation and left ventricular leads will be performed. If there is a lead dysfunction, the new lead will be implanted. The new CRT-D will be connected with leads and placed back into the pocket. The pocket will be closed by separate stitches (2-4 suffice) using the resorbable braided suture.
- DEVICE
-
CRT-D or CRT-D Leads Replacement with New Lead Implantation to Left Bundle Branch and Inactivation of Conventional Right and Left Ventricular Pacing
The local anesthesia will be performed on the left/right subclavian area after prepping the skin. The device pocket will be opened, the old CRT-D will be removed and disconnected from the leads. The pacing threshold, intracardiac signal amplitude and impedance (pacing and shock) on the atrial, defibrillation and left ventricular leads will be performed. If there is a lead dysfunction, the new lead will be implanted. The lead implantation to the left bundle branch (LBB) will be performed by transvenous approach and special delivery system. The new CRT-D will be connected with the leads (LBB pacing lead will be connected to defibrillation lead (DL) IS-1 connector of CRT-D and IS-1 tip of DL will be capped) and placed back into pocket. The pocket will be closed by separate stitches (2-4 suffice) using the resorbable braided suture. RV and LV pacing will be inactivated and only LBB pacing will be switched on.
- DEVICE
-
CRT-D or CRT-D Leads Replacement with New Lead Implantation to Left Bundle Branch and Inactivation of Conventional Right Ventricular Pacing
The local anesthesia will be performed on the left/right subclavian area after prepping the skin. The device pocket will be opened, the old CRT-D will be removed and disconnected from the leads. The pacing threshold, intracardiac signal amplitude and impedance (pacing and shock) on the atrial, defibrillation and left ventricular leads will be performed. If there is a lead dysfunction, the new lead will be implanted. The lead implantation to the left bundle branch (LBB) will be performed by transvenous approach and special delivery system. The new CRT-D will be connected with the leads (LBB pacing lead will be connected to defibrillation lead (DL) IS-1 connector of CRT-D and IS-1 tip of DL will be capped) and placed back into pocket. The pocket will be closed by separate stitches (2-4 suffice) using the resorbable braided suture. LBB and LV pacing will be switched on.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Tariel A Atabekov, Ph.D. · Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
-
Roman E Batalov, M.D. · Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2028-06-01
- Completion
- 2028-09-01
Countries
- Russia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Dual-Site LV Pacing in CRT Non Responders: Multicenter Randomized Trial
NCT01059175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Techniques for Choosing the Best Place to Put a Pacing Lead for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
NCT02061241 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficiency Study of Triple-Site Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT00814840 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Triple-site Biventricular Stimulation in the Optimization of CRT
NCT02350842 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing As A Rescue Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-Response
NCT05884411 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Right Atrial Left Ventricular Fusion Pacing in Patients With CRT Indications
NCT03071978 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
REsynchronization Comparison In LBBB and Normal or Mildly Reduced VENTricular Function With CRT (REINVENT-CRT)
NCT05652218 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Invasive Method for Evaluation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT05868616 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effect of Targeting Left Ventricular Lead Position on the Rate of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
NCT00399594 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
ConTempoRary Cardiac Stimulation in Clinical practicE: lEft, BivEntriculAr, Right, and conDuction System Pacing
NCT06324682 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Left Septal or Deep Septal Pacing to Prevent Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy
NCT06474819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Right Ventricular Septal and Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients Receiving a CRT-D Device
NCT00833352 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Pilot Study of Interventricular Septal Puncture for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Treat Heart Failure
NCT01818765 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combining Myocardial Strain and Cardiac CT to Optimize Left Ventricular Lead Placement in CRT Treatment
NCT01426321 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With RBBB
NCT05936294 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
B-Left HF: Biventricular Versus Left Univentricular Pacing With Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) Back-Up in Heart Failure Patients
NCT00187213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LV Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
NCT02174289 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
His Bundle Pacing in Bradycardia and Heart Failure
NCT03008291 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Selective Coronary Vein Sampling in Left Bundle Branch Block and CRT
NCT02396875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ensure Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Study
NCT00291564 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Stimulus Intensity in Left Ventricular Leads
NCT01060449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Pacing Rate for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT06445439 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of CRT Optimization as Assessed by Cardiac MR
NCT04763460 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT04110431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic Left vEntricular Dysfunction (REVERSE)
NCT00271154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA