MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in Infants Undergoing Neurosurgery: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT04153370 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2020-02-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

difficult intubation is high in the 0-1 year period. Video laryngoscopes improved intubation success rate when compared to direct laryngoscopy.

We compared the Airtraq, Glidescope, and c-mac video laryngoscopes during intubation of \<1 year old children undergoing neurosurgery.

Conditions

  • Infant Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Airtraq

airtraq video laryngoscope was used for intubation of the infant

DEVICE

glidescope

glidescope video laryngoscope was used for intubation of the infant

DEVICE

c-mac

c-mac video laryngoscope was used for intubation of the infant

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kocaeli University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Max Age
1 Year
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-11-05
Primary Completion
2020-02-05
Completion
2020-02-05

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04153370 on ClinicalTrials.gov