Single-port Access Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT01048931 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2010-01-14
Summary
Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard treatment for many gynecologic disease processes. In the last decade, numerous studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic approaches to various gynecologic oncology conditions-particularly for early-stage endometrial and cervical cancers as well as select pelvic masses-is feasible and results in shorter hospital stays, improved quality of life and comparable surgical and oncologic outcomes to abdominal staging \[1-5\].For instance, the typical gynecologic robotic surgical procedure will require Two to three 5-mm ports and one 12-mm laparoscopic ports. Recently, an even less invasive alternative to conventional laparoscopy surgery has been developed: laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), also known as single-port surgery. Single port laparoscopy is an attempt to further enhance the cosmetic benefits of minimally invasive surgery while minimizing the potential morbidity associated with multiple incisions. However, to our knowledge, there are no randomize control trial to evaluate of single port or multiple ports laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of SPA-LAVH in the treatment of benign uterine disease.
Conditions
- Uterine Myomas
- Adenomyosis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
single-port LAVH
single-port LAVH
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
collaborator OTHER -
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Yi-Jen Chen, MD · Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 30 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2010-10-31
- Completion
- 2010-10-31
Countries
- Taiwan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02059954 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
NCT03548831 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Surgical Success After Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT01793584 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Application of Laparo-endoscopic Single-site Surgery and Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic in Gynecology
NCT04096872 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT01483417 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Versus Transvaginal Closure of the Vaginal Vault After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT06867614 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Health-Related QoL Among Women Receiving Hysterectomy in NTUH
NCT00155870 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Safety and Efficacy of Using a Novel Full Visual Access Platform System in Transvaginal Hysterectomy
NCT06658145 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Micro-laparoscopy and Single-port Hysterectomy
NCT01666483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LESS-TLH Versus LESS-LAVH
NCT01861067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy in Women With Endometrial Neoplasia
NCT03698604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IA1 With LVSI, IA2)
NCT04934982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Three Surgical Pathways for Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy
NCT06817460 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00485355 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer
NCT00614211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Research on Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT06489171 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Minilap Hysterectomy
NCT03251677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Benefits and Limits of Laparoscopic Surgery for Uterine Fibroids
NCT00860002 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB3,IIA2)
NCT04939831 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcome of Laparoscopic or Robotic Metroplasty for Uterine Isthmocele
NCT04414670 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Management of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT04999696 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB1,IB2,IIA1)
NCT04929769 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Association Between Surgical Timing and Route of Total Hysterectomy After LEEP and Perioperative Risk in Patients With Cervical HSIL
NCT06325592 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Presumably Early Stage Cervical Cancer: a Retrospective Multicenter Non-inferiority Study Comparing Overall and Progression-free Survival.
NCT07120529 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension
NCT05586984 ·Status: RECRUITING