MedTrace Logo

Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT01483417 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 240

Last updated 2012-02-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Multi-center prospective randomized trial of single port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus conventional 3-4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy. Hypothesis is that conversion rate of SILS is not inferior to that of conventional approach.

Conditions

  • Uterine Myoma
  • Uterine Adenomyosis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Single incision Laparoscopic hysterectomy

SILS port

PROCEDURE

Conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy

3-4 conventional ports

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Samsung Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Chi-Heum Cho, MD, PhD · Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-12-31
Primary Completion
2012-12-31
Completion
2013-03-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01483417 on ClinicalTrials.gov