Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IA1 With LVSI, IA2)
NCT04934982 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 690
Last updated 2021-11-10
Summary
The purpose of this study is to confirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patient survival for Cervical Cancer (Stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2)
Conditions
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy
Stage IA1 with lymphovascular interstitial infiltration and IA2 surgical approach was type B (modified radical hysterectomy plus bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, i.e., resection of 1\~2 cm of the parametrium and 1\~2 cm of the vagina) with abdominal para-aortic lymph node dissection if necessary (surgical staging according to FIGO 2018 and surgical staging according to Querleu-Morrow staging).
- OTHER
-
Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy
Stage IA1 with lymphovascular interstitial infiltration and IA2 surgical approach was type B (modified radical hysterectomy plus bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, i.e., resection of 1\~2 cm of the parametrium and 1\~2 cm of the vagina) with abdominal para-aortic lymph node dissection if necessary (surgical staging according to FIGO 2018 and surgical staging according to Querleu-Morrow staging).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan University
collaborator OTHER -
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
collaborator OTHER -
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
RenJi Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
Taizhou Hospital, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
collaborator UNKNOWN -
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
collaborator OTHER -
Hua Jiang
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hua Jiang, PHD · The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-09-24
- Primary Completion
- 2024-06-30
- Completion
- 2026-06-30
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer
NCT00614211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer
NCT01893333 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Presumably Early Stage Cervical Cancer: a Retrospective Multicenter Non-inferiority Study Comparing Overall and Progression-free Survival.
NCT07120529 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Radical Versus Simple Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection With Low-risk Early Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT01658930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy In Patients With Early Cervical Cancer
NCT01258413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Multicentre Trial of Nerve-Spring Radical Hysterectomy vs. Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
NCT01886508 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Research on Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT06489171 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Management of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT04999696 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Association Between Surgical Timing and Route of Total Hysterectomy After LEEP and Perioperative Risk in Patients With Cervical HSIL
NCT06325592 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy VS Radical Hysterectomy: Safety and Clinical Efficacy
NCT03069040 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Five-year Survival and Disease-free Survival in Patients Diagnosed With Endometrium Cancer Who Underwent Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With and Without Uterine Manipulator
NCT06307886 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Minimally Invasive Benign Hysterectomy
NCT01865929 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study Assessing Emotional, Sexual and Quality of Life Concerns Of Women Undergoing Removal of the Cervix Versus Removal of the Uterus,Ovaries and Fallopian Tubes For Treatment Of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT00579787 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT02320578 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-port Access Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT01048931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Prognosis in Endometrial Cancer Treated With Different Surgical Methods: Laparoscopy, Robotic-assisted Laparoscopy and Laparotomy
NCT05969405 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Medico-economic Evaluation of Robot-assisted Laparoscopy Compared With Conventional Laparoscopy in Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
NCT06348719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SUCCOR-Surgery in Cervical Cancer Comparing Different Surgical Aproaches in Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer
NCT03958305 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
NCT03548831 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00485355 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00734812 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Clinical Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Three Surgical Pathways for Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy
NCT06817460 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
German-funded Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer
NCT06489795 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radical Hysterectomy: Evolution Of Surgical Approach and Related Outcomes
NCT03577613 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy in Women With Endometrial Neoplasia
NCT03698604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA