MedTrace Logo

Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Management of Early Stage Cervical Cancer

NCT04999696 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 820

Last updated 2023-02-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (+/- aortic lymph node dissection) is the standard treatment for early stage cervical cancer. And minimally invasive surgery has been successfully and safely demonstrated in the treatment of early stage cervical cancer. This study aims to compare total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and total abdominal radical hysterectomy in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival. Rates and characteristics of recurrence, incidence of complications and morbidity, impact on quality of life and cost-effectiveness will also be determined.

Conditions

  • Cancer of Cervix
  • Laparoscopic Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

radical hysterectomy

To compare disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with early stage cervical cancer undergoing total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus total abdominal radical hysterectomy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-09-30
Primary Completion
2031-07-31
Completion
2033-07-31

Countries

  • Taiwan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04999696 on ClinicalTrials.gov