Micro-laparoscopy and Single-port Hysterectomy
NCT01666483 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 71
Last updated 2012-08-16
Summary
A total of 86 patients underwent total hysterectomy. Three of them refused randomization, 34 were randomly assigned to undergo to laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and 34 to undergo micro-laparoscopy (M-LPS).Laparoscopic hysterectomy can be safely performed by M-LPS and LESS.
Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
micro-laparoscopy
M-LPS hysterectomy was performed through one optical trans-umbilical 5 mm trocar and three 3 mm sovra-pubic ancillary ports. A 5 mm 0° endoscope and 3 mm laparoscopic instruments were utilized, choosing among graspers, cold scissors, suction/irrigation and bipolar coagulator.
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoendoscopic single site surgery
LESS hysterectomy was performed through a multi-channel single trocar inserted in the umbilicus using an open technique (1.5-2 cm cutaneous incision), as previously reported. Intra-abdominal visualization was obtained with a 0° 5-mm telescope with a flexible tip. Working straight 5-mm instruments were inserted into the remaining 2 ports, choosing among graspers, cold scissors, suction/irrigation bipolar coagulator and a multifunctional versatile laparoscopic device, which grasps, coagulates and transects simultaneously. In order to prevent clashing between instruments and surgeon's hands and to facilitate surgical manoeuvres, the combination of one 33 cm-long instrument with a 43 cm-long instrument was adopted. The umbilical fascia was closed with a figure-of-eight 0-Vicryl.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Francesco Fanfani, MD · Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
-
Anna Fagotti, PhD · Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
-
Maria L Gagliardi, MD · Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
-
Giorgia Monterossi, MD · Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
-
Cristiano Rossitto, MD · Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
-
Barbara Costantini, MD · Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
-
Salvatore Gueli Alletti, MD · Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
-
Giovanni Scambia, MD · Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-02-29
- Completion
- 2012-05-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
LESS-TLH Versus LESS-LAVH
NCT01861067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
NCT03548831 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy: Single- vs. Multi-port Laparoscopic Access
NCT03373513 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Via a Single Port, Peri-umbilical Technique Versus a Conventional Laparoscopic Technique
NCT01830738 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Site Versus Multi Site Robotic Hysterectomy
NCT03662451 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00734812 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison Between Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery and Multi-port Laparoscopy in Treating Uterine Fibroids
NCT06244251 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of a Minimally Invasive Approach to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy on Postoperative Recovery
NCT05102032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hysterectomy by Transabdominal Laparoscopy or NOTES
NCT02631837 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy In Patients With Early Cervical Cancer
NCT01258413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Feasibility and Benefit of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Less Than 3 Millimeter Diameter's Instruments in Current Practice
NCT02367703 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy in Women With Endometrial Neoplasia
NCT03698604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Simple Hysterectomy in Low Risk Cervical Cancer
NCT06416748 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Bilateral Uterine Artery Ligation in Decreasing Blood Loss in Trans-abdominal Myomectomy
NCT02643186 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Transumbilical Versus Transvaginal Specimen Retrieval at Minilaparoscopy
NCT01418807 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of Learning Curves for Two Different Techniques in Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT06220253 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy in Benign and Preinvasive Uterine Disease
NCT01679548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Implementation of MinimAlly Invasive Hysterectomy Trial
NCT03617354 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Total Laparoscopic Hystrectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hystrectomy
NCT03407846 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Efficacy of TU-LESS and vNOTES for Hysterectomy of Enlarged Uterus
NCT06663553 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT01064128 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02059954 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Trial on Pain and Recovery"
NCT07306507 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LESS Surgery Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopy in Ovarian Drilling
NCT03206892 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00485355 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA