MedTrace Logo

Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT00485355 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 27

Last updated 2014-02-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two ways of performing laparoscopic hysterectomy - robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopy.

Conditions

  • Uterine Fibroids, Menorrhagia, Endometriosis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy

PROCEDURE

robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy

Robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with DaVinci robot

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The Cleveland Clinic

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Marie FR Paraiso, MD · The Cleveland Clinic

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-06-30
Primary Completion
2012-12-31
Completion
2012-12-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00485355 on ClinicalTrials.gov