MedTrace Logo

Study Comparing OsseoSpeed™ Implants of Two Different Lengths in the Upper and Lower Posterior Jaw

NCT00545818 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 97

Last updated 2020-05-19

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to see if OsseoSpeed™ implant 6 mm long is effective for rehabilitation of edentulism and if so, how it compares with OsseoSpeed™ implant 11 mm long. The primary hypothesis is that the alteration in bone level is equal in patients randomized to 6 mm as to patients randomized to 11 mm implants.

Conditions

  • Jaw, Edentulous, Partially

Interventions

DEVICE

OsseoSpeed™ length 6 mm

OsseoSpeed™ dental implant, length: 6 mm

DEVICE

OsseoSpeed™ length 11 mm

OsseoSpeed™ dental implant, length: 11 mm

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Anna-Karin Lundgren · Direktor Clinical Research, Dentsply Sirona Implants, Mölndal, SWEDEN

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-11-30
Primary Completion
2016-05-31
Completion
2016-05-31

Countries

  • United States
  • Australia
  • Netherlands
  • Sweden
  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00545818 on ClinicalTrials.gov