Comparison of the Use of Natural and Synthetic Bone Substitutes in Dental Implants
NCT05938114 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2023-11-30
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of a natural and synthetic bone substitute in preserving the alveolar ridge (bone) of a single- rooted tooth after an extraction.
The main question it aims to answer:
Is there a difference between natural (Bio-Oss®) and synthetic (Bonalive®) bone substitutes in preserving the alveolar ridge dimensions based on changes in the width of the alveolar ridge (expressed in millimetres) from augmentation (baseline) to 24-week follow-up (post augmentation)?
Participants will have a tooth extraction and a bone substitute will be inserted into their socket immediately after. Participants will be divided into two equal groups and those in group A will receive Bio-Oss® while those in group B will receive Bonalive®. In both groups measurements of the alveolar bone will be taken when the bone substitute is inserted and 24 weeks after the insertion of the bone substitute. These measurements will be used to compare the effectiveness of Bio-Oss® and Bonalive in preserving the alveolar bone of a tooth after an extraction.
Conditions
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Bonalive
Bonalive® is a bioactive glass synthetic bone substitute material that has been shown to have a low substitution rate and antibacterial properties. It has been used successfully in the orthopaedics, craniofacial and ear nose and throat (ENT) specialities for the treatment of osteomyelitis, sinusitis and bony cyst cavities. There have also been a few maxillofacial surgery case reports on its usage in the jaws.
- OTHER
-
Bio-Oss®
Bio-Oss® is a bovine xenogeneic bone graft substitute that is widely used in regenerative dentistry. Bio-Oss® is very similar to human bone in its structure and chemical make-up. The material's porosity allows for vascularisation and new bone formation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Imperial College London
collaborator OTHER -
University of Central Lancashire
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ihtesham Rehman, PhD · University of Central Lancashire
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2024-07-31
- Completion
- 2024-07-31
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effectiveness in Limiting the Need to Elevate the Maxillary Sinus
NCT03357705 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Boned-Apatite Cement at the Time of Extraction for Ridge Preservation at These Sites
NCT02440048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Local Application of Simvastatin Versus Bone Powder on Implant Bone Changes
NCT06016218 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Demineralized Whole-tooth vs Demineralized Particulate Dentin Grafts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05336149 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Minimally Invasive Subperiosteal Tunneling With Xenogenic Bone Graft and PRF
NCT07079917 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation With Space Maintenance Devices
NCT00991432 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Ridge Expansion by Osseodensification Simultaneously With Implant Placement in Narrow Alveolar Ridges
NCT03592381 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Augmentation With Osteon at Dental Implant Placement
NCT01162629 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Grafting of the Peri-implant Bony Defects Around Immediate Implants Using Xenogenic Versus Alloplastic Sticky Grafts: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT06653868 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Central Incisors Narrow Implants in Alternative to Bone Augmentation With 4.2 mm Implants .
NCT02897193 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
NCT01431131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of the Sinus Floor-to-lower Window Margin Distance on Outcomes of Bone Window Repositioning in Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation With Simultaneous Implant Placement
NCT07045389 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ridge Expansion by Osseodensification
NCT04748952 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Bovine-derived Xenograft With or Without L-PRF for Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06172114 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation in Molar Sites Comparing Xenograft Versus Mineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft
NCT05107141 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biomaterial to Counteract Ridge Reduction Following the Removal of Multiple Adjacent Teeth.
NCT02903667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05572242 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Straumann Bone Ceramic and Bio-Oss With Guided Tissue Regeneration for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT00900718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation Using a Ossix™ Bone vs Bio-Oss® Collagen
NCT04338516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Post Tooth Extraction Healing Using Different Xenograft Materials
NCT03149172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Material Comparison in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
NCT04433117 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Bioactive Surfaces vs. Conventional Surfaces in Implants Placed in Atrophic Maxilla With Simultaneous Sinus Lift
NCT05500911 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation Treatment Using OSSIX® BREEZE vs Jason®
NCT05584566 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Collagen Material and Allograft
NCT04321109 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Osseodensification and Implant Survival and Success
NCT04741594 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA