Comparison of Limited Fluoroscopy and Conventional URSL
NCT07788612 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2026-08-26
Summary
Background: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is the standard treatment for ureteric stones. Conventional URSL employs routine fluoroscopy for guidewire positioning, scope advancement, stent placement, and complication detection. While facilitating the procedure, this approach exposes patients and operating theatre staff to ionizing radiation, with attendant long-term health risks and occupational hazards from lead apron use. Retrospective and prospective case series have suggested that URSL can be performed safely with limited or no fluoroscopy using direct endoscopic visualization and tactile feedback. However, no randomized controlled trial has directly compared the stone clearance rates and radiation exposure between these two approaches.
Purpose: This two-center prospective randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and radiation exposure of limited-fluoroscopy URSL and to compare its complication profile, operative outcomes, and stone-free rates against conventional fluoroscopy-guided URSL.
Study question: Does a limited-fluoroscopy protocol significantly reduce intraoperative radiation dose without compromising the success rate, safety, or operative efficiency of ureteroscopic lithotripsy?
Methods: A total of 60 adult patients (≥18 years) with ureteric stones scheduled for URSL will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the limited-fluoroscopy arm (fluoroscopy used only at surgeon's discretion for safety, with primary reliance on endoscopic landmarks) or the conventional arm (routine fluoroscopy throughout the procedure). The primary endpoint is radiation exposure (mGy). Secondary endpoints include stone-free rate at follow-up, operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and need for auxiliary procedures.
Conditions
- Ureteric Stone
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
Surgical procedure performed under general or regional anaesthesia using a semi-rigid or flexible ureteroscope to access the ureteric stone. Stone fragmentation is achieved using a holmium:YAG laser with energy settings determined by stone composition and size. Fragments may be retrieved using endoscopic baskets or forceps. Ureteric stent placement and retrograde pyelography are performed as clinically indicate
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
collaborator OTHER -
The University of Hong Kong
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2017-01-31
- Completion
- 2017-07-31
Countries
- Hong Kong
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
to Compare the Effectiveness of Thulium Fiber Laser and Holmium YAG Laser for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
NCT05218057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Stone Cone Device vs. Standard URS for Proximal Ureteral Calculi
NCT07769450 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT05231577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT07772635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Ureteroscopy for Acute Obstructive Nephropathy Due to Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Non-randomized Feasibility and Safety Trial
NCT07177313 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy And Safety Of Antegrade Uretroscopic Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy In The Treatment Of Upper Ureteric Stones Measuring > 10 mm In Maximum Dimension. A Randomized Comparative Study
NCT07362784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fluoroscopic Guided vs US-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy for the Treatment of Stone Disease
NCT04606758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Ultrasound for Detecting Residual Fragments During RIRS
NCT05535816 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study on 'The Use of Non-contrast Helical Computerized Tomogram in Predicting Treatment Outcomes of Upper Ureteric Stone by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using the Sonolith 4000+ Lithotripter'
NCT00517205 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Management of Ureteral Calculi Using Ultrasound Guidance: A Radiation Free Approach
NCT01792765 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Techniques for Treating Large Proximal Ureteral Stones
NCT06199518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones
NCT07589153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An Intelligent Pressure and Temperature Control Ureteral Soft Scope System for Treating Stones With Infection.
NCT06841523 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS
NCT03717285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison Between Ureteral Stent and Nephrostomy Tube for an Urgent Drainage of Obstructed Kidney
NCT00739284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA