Stone Cone Device vs. Standard URS for Proximal Ureteral Calculi
NCT07769450 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2026-08-18
Summary
Retrograde migration of stone fragments into the kidney during ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) for proximal ureteral stones is a common technical challenge, occurring in 5-40% of cases. This can lead to residual fragments and lower stone-free rates. The Stone Cone is an anti-retropulsion device designed to trap fragments and prevent their migration. This study will test the hypothesis that the use of the Stone Cone during URS pneumatic lithotripsy will result in a significantly higher stone clearance rate at 48 hours post-procedure compared to the standard technique without the device.
Conditions
- Ureter Calculi
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy with Cone Device
Patients will undergo ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy under general anesthesia. The Stone Cone device (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) will be advanced through the ureteroscope and positioned fluoroscopically proximal to the calculus before fragmentation. The device will create a mechanical barrier to prevent retrograde stone migration into the renal pelvis and will be used to trap and extract fragments upon withdrawal. A ureteral double-J stent will be placed at the end of the procedure.
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy
Patients will undergo standard ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy under general anesthesia without the use of any anti-retropulsion device. Stone fragmentation and fragment extraction will be performed using standard tools (pneumatic lithotripter, grasping forceps, or basket) as per the surgeon's discretion. A ureteral double-J stent will be placed at the end of the procedure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Provincial Headquarter Teaching Hospital Gilgit
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Khawar Suliman, MBBS, FCPS · Provincial Headquarter Teaching Hospital Gilgit
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-04-30
- Completion
- 2026-06-30
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Efficacy And Safety Of Antegrade Uretroscopic Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy In The Treatment Of Upper Ureteric Stones Measuring > 10 mm In Maximum Dimension. A Randomized Comparative Study
NCT07362784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones
NCT02028559 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Ureteroscopy for Acute Obstructive Nephropathy Due to Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Non-randomized Feasibility and Safety Trial
NCT07177313 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Efficiency and Stone-Free Rates Mini PCNL vs Flex URS
NCT07072598 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotriptor Indicated for Fragmenting Urinary Stones in the Kidney
NCT00959153 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Single-use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope vs Nondisposable Fiber Optic vs Digital Ureteroscope
NCT03220516 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PCNL Versus Standard-PCNL For The Management of 20-40 mm Size Kidney Stones
NCT02635048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Supine vs. Prone PCNL for Large Renal Stones: A Randomized Trial in Yemen.
NCT07627503 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones
NCT07589153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Ureteral Catheterization Is Not Essential in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06750913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL for Distal Ureteric Stone: Supine Versus Prone
NCT02298465 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Dual Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy to a Single Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy
NCT00351351 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Versus Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones
NCT07464717 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT07159035 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNL
NCT06288022 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An Intelligent Pressure and Temperature Control Ureteral Soft Scope System for Treating Stones With Infection.
NCT06841523 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteroscopy Combined With Negative Pressure Sheath Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT06938113 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
A Comparative Study of Three Ureteral Stenting Strategies After Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi
NCT07616505 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA