Direct vs Indirect In-House Clear Aligners vs Fixed Appliances in Orthodontic Treatment

NCT07687329 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 36

Last updated 2026-07-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Clear aligner therapy has become increasingly popular as an esthetic alternative to conventional braces in orthodontic treatment. While clear aligners are traditionally manufactured by commercial laboratories using a thermoforming technique, recent advances in 3D printing technology now allow clinicians to produce aligners directly in their own clinic, either by printing the aligner itself (direct method) or by printing a model and then thermoforming the aligner over it (indirect method)." "This study compares three approaches to orthodontic treatment in patients with mild to moderate dental crowding who do not require tooth extraction: clear aligners produced directly in-house using 3D printing with a shape-memory resin, clear aligners produced indirectly in-house using a 3D-printed model and thermoforming, and conventional fixed orthodontic treatment with metal brackets and wires." "A total of 36 patients aged 12 to 30 years were randomly assigned to one of these three treatment groups, and 33 patients completed the study. Treatment quality was evaluated using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS), an objective scoring method based on dental models obtained at the end of treatment. The total duration of treatment, from the start of active treatment to its completion, was also compared among the three groups." "The findings of this study may help clinicians and patients better understand the advantages and limitations of in-house clear aligner production compared to conventional fixed appliances, particularly regarding treatment efficiency and duration.

Conditions

  • Malocclusion, Angle Class I

Interventions

DEVICE

Direct In-House Clear Aligners

Clear aligners fabricated directly by the clinician using a stereolithography (SLA) 3D printer (Asiga MAX UV) with a shape-memory resin (Tera Harz TC-85, Graphy Inc., Seoul, Korea). The shell of the aligner was designed digitally using Direct Aligner Designer software and printed directly, without the need for a physical model. Printed aligners were post-processed by centrifugation to remove excess resin, followed by UV light curing.

DEVICE

Indirect In-House Clear Aligners

Clear aligners fabricated indirectly by the clinician via 3D-printed dental models (Asiga MAX UV printer) followed by thermoforming using CA Pro+ sheets (0.75 x 120 mm, SCHEU-DENTAL GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany) with a pressure-forming machine (MINISTAR S). The thermoformed aligners were trimmed from the printed model after shaping.

DEVICE

Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

Conventional fixed orthodontic treatment using metal brackets (AO, Mini Master Roth 018, ) bonded to the upper and lower dental arches with stainless steel archwires.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

    collaborator OTHER
  • TC Erciyes University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ahmet Yağcı, Prof. Dr. · Erciyes University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics

  • Musa Göksu, DDS · Erciyes University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
12 Years
Max Age
30 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-02-15
Primary Completion
2025-03-15
Completion
2025-03-15

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07687329 on ClinicalTrials.gov