Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Color Stability Between Direct 3D-printed and Thermoformed Retainers
NCT07053410 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2025-07-11
Summary
This study aims to compare two types of orthodontic retainers used after active treatment to maintain teeth position. The retainers are fabricated using either direct 3D-printing or thermoforming methods. The study will evaluate which method provides better dimensional accuracy (fit) and color stability over time. Adult patients who have completed their orthodontic treatment will be randomly assigned to one of three groups, each receiving a different type of retainer. The research is conducted at the Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University - Assiut Branch. The goal is to help orthodontists select the most reliable and durable type of retainer for long-term use.
Conditions
- Orthodontic Retention Appliance
- Clear Orthodontic Retainers
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Direct 3D-Printed Retainer
Orthodontic retainers fabricated using direct 3D printing technology from digital STL models. The retainers are printed with biocompatible clear resin using an additive manufacturing process.
- DEVICE
-
Single-Layer Thermoformed Retainer
Clear orthodontic retainers fabricated by thermoforming a single-layer thermoplastic sheet over a 3D printed dental model using a vacuum forming machine.
- DEVICE
-
Multi-Layer Thermoformed Retainer
Orthodontic retainers fabricated using a multi-layer thermoforming technique combining different thermoplastic materials to enhance durability and fit accuracy.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Essraa hassan Hussein Mohamed
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mostafa M. Dawaba, PhD · Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University - Assiut Branch
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2027-12-31
- Completion
- 2028-12-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Augmented Reality-Assisted Bonding Versus Digitally-Assisted Indirect Bonding in Orthodontic Patients
NCT04658446 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transfer Accuracy of 3D-printed Indirect Bonding Trays
NCT04683874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Two Different Attachments (Equator Vs Ball and Sockets) Retaining Mandibular Implant Overdenture in Order to See Bone Changes and Occlusal Force Distribution
NCT07241481 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Removable Retainers
NCT05854953 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints in Dentistry
NCT07236294 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of the Lingual Brackets and Labial Brackets in the Leveling Phase
NCT04357067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Compare Nighttime Aligners to Daytime Aligners
NCT06539676 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation Of Two Bone-Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization Appliances: Direct Versus Indirect Anchorage
NCT06507319 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Difference Between Pressing and Vacuum Techniques in Fabrication of Orthodontic Aligners in Cases With Spacing: A Cross-sectional Study
NCT06231875 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Essix Retainer vs Hawley Retainer
NCT01583933 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Efficiency of Clear Aligners in Maxillary Molar Distalization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT06330571 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Dentoalveolar Changes of Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances on Skeletal Class I Non-extraction Patients With Dental Crowding
NCT07090746 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bracket Bonding Variables Using 3D Printed Bonding Guide Versus Digital Indirect Bonding
NCT05193708 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Fixed Mandibular Retainer Using 3D Printed Positioning Tray Versus Direct Bonding Technique
NCT03572179 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tooth Discoloration and Chairside Handling Time (Bonding-Debonding) in Flowable Versus Packable Composites for Clear Aligner Bonded Attachments: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07234149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Effectiveness of Different Esthetic Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06803433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AMOUNT OF INTRAORAL OCCLUSAL ADJUSTMENTS IN OCCLUSAL SPLINTS FABRICATED USING FULLY DIGITAL VERSUS COMBINED DIGITAL WORKFLOW IN TMD PATIENTS
NCT06752200 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Printed Orthodontic Molar Distalizer
NCT07191158 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
NCT06476574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Periodontal Health, Bonding Time and Failure Between Direct and Indirect Fixed Retainer Placement Among Orthodontic Patients
NCT07107100 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Patient Preference on Retention Success
NCT06478771 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Perforated 3D Printed Versus Conventional Metal Fixed Bonded Retainer
NCT06851897 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusal Stabilization Splints Equilibrated by Different Techniques and Their Effect on TMD
NCT04661670 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA