Indirect Bonding Accuracy of 3D Printed Digital Transfer Trays
NCT06167278 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2023-12-12
Summary
The goal of this study is to compare the bracket transfer accuracy of two frequently used 3D printed indirect bonding trays.
This is an interventional study. Participants have 3-6mm crowding without tooth loss and deformity. It is planned to be 2 groups in the study. Each group will include 15 participants. Indirect bonding will be applied with shell and bar designs that are frequently used. Brackets will be bonded from second premolar to other side's second premolar of upper and lower jaw. Bracket transfer accuracy of two different trays will be compared with planned position and each other.
Conditions
- Orthodontics
- Bracket Bonding
- Indirect Bonding
- Digital Indirect Bonding Transfer Tray
- Accuracy of Bracket Positioning
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Indirect bonding with two different digital bracket bonding transfer tray
To achieve more precise and predictable result is the common aim in contemporary treatment. Digital indirect bonding (IDB) is used for this purpose in orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study is to compare the transfer accuracy of two different IDB trays. Digital IDB was performed on a total of 30 patients, using one of the two designs: shell and bar trays; with 15 patients in each group. Trays were designed with the Appliance Designer software (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) as shell and bar types.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Marmara University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 17 Years
- Max Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-06-15
- Primary Completion
- 2023-12-15
- Completion
- 2024-02-15
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Segmented Versus Full Arch Three Dimensionally Printed Transfer Tray for Orthodontic Indirect Bonding
NCT03564717 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transfer Accuracy of 3D-printed Indirect Bonding Trays
NCT04683874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Color Stability Between Direct 3D-printed and Thermoformed Retainers
NCT07053410 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Alignment Achieved Using Computer-guided Indirect Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets to Conventional Appliance Placement
NCT02221856 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation Of Two Bone-Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization Appliances: Direct Versus Indirect Anchorage
NCT06507319 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Fixed Mandibular Retainer Using 3D Printed Positioning Tray Versus Direct Bonding Technique
NCT03572179 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Augmented Reality-Assisted Bonding Versus Digitally-Assisted Indirect Bonding in Orthodontic Patients
NCT04658446 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
AMOUNT OF INTRAORAL OCCLUSAL ADJUSTMENTS IN OCCLUSAL SPLINTS FABRICATED USING FULLY DIGITAL VERSUS COMBINED DIGITAL WORKFLOW IN TMD PATIENTS
NCT06752200 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Chairside Time and Accuracy of Indirect Bonding of Orthodontic Attachments Using Double Versus Single Transfer Tray
NCT03362034 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bond Failure with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Visible Light-cure Composite Bonding Material in Adult Orthodontic Patients - a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06602154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Computer-aided Indirect Bonding Versus Traditional Direct Bonding of Brackets in Orthodontic Patients
NCT04395625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tooth Discoloration and Chairside Handling Time (Bonding-Debonding) in Flowable Versus Packable Composites for Clear Aligner Bonded Attachments: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07234149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy, Stability and Safety of Orthodontic Mini-implant Template in the Infrazygomatic Crest Zone
NCT06786221 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Direct 3D Printed Clear Aligner System and Indirect Clear Aligner Systems With Fixed Orthodontic Treatment in Terms of Endocrine Disrupting Monomer Release, Treatment Effectiveness and Efficiency
NCT06685029 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RMGI v Composite for Orthodontic Bonding
NCT01925924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Bonding vs. Direct Bonding Study
NCT06266130 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints in Dentistry
NCT07236294 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Difference Between Pressing and Vacuum Techniques in Fabrication of Orthodontic Aligners in Cases With Spacing: A Cross-sectional Study
NCT06231875 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Difference Between Pressing and Vacuum Techniques in Fabrication of Orthodontic Aligners in Cases With Crowding: A Cross-sectional Study
NCT06231888 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Chairside Time and Bond Failure of Non Custom Versus Custom Base Orthodontic Attachments During Indirect Bonding
NCT03365232 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Precision Orthodontics: Virtual Treatment Planning for Orthodontic Braces
NCT04002999 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Smile Arc Assessment in Orthodontic Patients Following Smile Arc Protection VS MBT Placement Guide Bonding Strategies
NCT05277506 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Treatment Effects of Tooth Borne Versus Bone-anchored Protraction Procedures in Class III Patients With Maxillary Deficiency
NCT04863404 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Orthodontic Aligning Archwire Materials
NCT04090931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA