Clinical Performance of Direct-Printed Versus Thermoformed Aligners
NCT07637227 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2026-06-09
Summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of in-office directly 3D-printed clear aligners versus conventional multilayered thermoformed aligners.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Does the use of in-office direct-printed shape-memory aligners result in superior clinical effectiveness, compared to established multilayer thermoformed aligner systems?
Researchers will compare a Direct-Printed Aligner (DPA) group using Senertek Clear-A V2 resin to a Thermoformed Aligner (TFA) group using Zendura FLX multilayer sheets to see if the additive manufacturing process improves clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Participants will:
* Undergo initial records including intraoral digital scans, photos, and a panoramic radiograph for treatment planning.
* Wear their assigned clear aligners (either direct-printed or thermoformed) for at least 22 hours per day, changing them every 7 days.
* Attend follow-up appointments every 5 weeks.
Conditions
- Angle Class I Malocclusion
- Dental Crowding
- Tooth Spacing
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Direct-Printed Aligner
Participants in this group will receive clear aligner therapy fabricated via direct-printing, utilizing a specialized light-curable resin (Clear-A V2, Senertek, İzmir, Turkey).
- DEVICE
-
Thermoformed aligner
Participants in this group will treated with clear aligners fabricated via the conventional indirect method, involving the thermoforming of thermoplastic sheets (Zendura FLX, Zendura dental, Fremont, California) over 3D-printed dental molds.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Baghdad
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Noor Muhammed Garma, Assistant Professor · University of Baghdad, College of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontic.
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 15 Years
- Max Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2027-09-30
- Completion
- 2027-10-31
Countries
- Iraq
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Clear Aligners and Traditional Fixed Appliances in the Treatment of Four-premolar-extraction Cases
NCT03645356 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigate the Effectiveness of 3D-printed Shape Memory Aligners in the Treatment of Anterior Open Bite
NCT07420777 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed Reverse Twin Block for Class III Malocclusion
NCT07710391 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized In-Vivo Comparison of 3D-Printed and Thermoformed Clear Aligners: A Multi-Subject, Time-Dependent Analysis of Adaptation and Trueness
NCT07639515 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Shape Memory Orthodontic Aligners
NCT07431333 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Accuracy of 3D Printed Aligners in Comparison to Thermoformed Aligners in Orthodontic Patients
NCT07496892 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Colonization in Three Dimensional (3D) Printed Orthodontic Clear Aligners
NCT07143370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Biomimetic Materials in Preventing Enamel Demineralization During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment
NCT05940701 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single Aligner Appliance for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults.
NCT04988373 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Oral Health Related Quality of Life Changes Between Clear Aligners and Vestibular Fixed Appliances
NCT04866238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Modified 3D Printed Customized Facemask Appliance for Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT06250127 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of the I-arch System During the Initial Stage of Orthodontic Treatment
NCT07264127 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Crown Movement in Cases Treated With Direct Printed Aligners
NCT07273435 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment Outcome of Clear Aligner and Traditional Fixed Appliances in Four Premolar Extraction Cases
NCT07236775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency, Efficacy, Periodontal & Occlusal Outcomes for Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances in Crowded Incisor Treatment
NCT06731465 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of the Lingual Brackets and Labial Brackets in the Leveling Phase
NCT04357067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Metabolism in Patients Treated With 3d Printed Aligners Versus Thermoformed Aligners
NCT07617571 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Orthodontic Aligning Archwire Materials
NCT04090931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AI-Designed Clear Aligners: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06968325 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Indirect Bonding Accuracy of 3D Printed Digital Transfer Trays
NCT06167278 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Predictability of Part-time Wearing of Removable Clear Aligner Therapy Versus Full Time
NCT06253286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Investigation of the Transfer Accuracy of Semi-Digital and Fully Digital Indirect Bonding Trays
NCT07318857 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Effectiveness of Cobalt Chromium CAD-CAM Designed Customized Lingual Retainer
NCT06837168 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Color Stability Between Direct 3D-printed and Thermoformed Retainers
NCT07053410 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA