Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances

NCT04810286 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2021-03-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the dentoskeletal effects of Class II division 1 treatment in growing patients with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printing myofunctional appliance.

Conditions

  • Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Interventions

PROCEDURE

3d-Printing Myofunctional Appliance

To evaluate soft- and hard-tissue changes Class II division 1 tchildren with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printed myofunctional appliance.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk, PhD · T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
8 Years
Max Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-06-01
Primary Completion
2023-06-01
Completion
2023-11-01

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04810286 on ClinicalTrials.gov