Impact of Finishing/Polishing Systems on Ormocer VS Methacrylate Based Bulk Fill Flowable Composite in Class V
NCT07627295 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 25
Last updated 2026-06-04
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate and compare. Impact of finishing/polishing systems on ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite in Class V restorations: The main question it aims to answer is the following:
Are there any differences between finishing/polishing systems on Ormocer versus methacrylate-based bulk-fill flowable composite?
Conditions
- Class V Restorations
Interventions
- OTHER
-
one-step finishing and polishing system.
• Each class V restoration will be restored with an ormocer-based bulk-fill flowable composite material or methacrylate-based restorative according to the manufacturer's instructions for use, and then each class V restoration will be subjected to a one-step finishing and polishing system.
- OTHER
-
two-step finishing and polishing system.
Each class V restoration will be restored with an ormocer-based bulk-fill flowable composite material or methacrylate-based restorative according to the manufacturer's instructions for use, and then each class V restoration will be subjected to a two-step finishing and polishing system.
- OTHER
-
three-step finishing and polishing system.
Each Class V restoration will be restored with an ormocer-based bulk-fill flowable composite material or methacrylate-based restorative according to the manufacturer's instructions for use, and then each Class V restoration will be subjected to a three-step finishing and polishing system.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Doha M Zahran, master · MSc Postgraduate student ,Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
-
Maha Ebaya, PhD · Lecturer, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
-
asmaa abd allah, PhD · Assistant Professor, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
-
Abeer El-Embaby, PhD · Professor, Conservative Dentistry Department,Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-12
- Primary Completion
- 2028-05-31
- Completion
- 2028-05-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A 2-year Clinical Impact of Bulk-fill Low-viscosity Resin Composite Liners in Class II Restorations.
NCT06032689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Flowable Composite Versus Submicron Hybrid Composite in Class I Carious Cavities.
NCT07575282 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Class IV Restoration Using Organically Modified Ceramic (OMNOCER) in Comparison to a Methacrylate Based Composite Resin
NCT05623423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Different Ion-Releasing Restorative Systems in Class II Cavities
NCT07688343 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Curing Times and Intensitis
NCT05334901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Dentin Replacement Materials
NCT07320885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flowable Resin Composite: Two-Year Clinical Performance in Class I Restorations
NCT07330193 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluate the Shade Matching of Polychromatic Versus Monochromatic Composite Layering Techniques in Fractured Class IV Maxillary Central Incisors Using Universal , Layering & One Shade Composite In-vivo on Patients
NCT06743984 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of 3D-Printed Versus Semi-Direct Composite Resin Restorations
NCT07676929 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Versus Conventional Injectable Flowable Resin Composite Restorations in Class I Carious Cavities
NCT07535086 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations: Clinical Evaluation
NCT07518537 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Cavity Designs on the Clinical Performance of 3D- Printed Resin Composite Partial-Coverage Restorations in Vital Molars
NCT07667946 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One-Step Universal Adhesives: A 3-year Clinical Trial in Class II Composite Restorations
NCT06265116 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Viscosity-Modified Composite Resins: Preheated, Sonic Activated, and Flowable Resins in Class V Restorations
NCT07491770 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns
NCT06348979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Various Bilayer Biomimetic Resin Composite Strategies
NCT07285772 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT03515265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of CAD/CAM Fabricated Lithium-Disilicate Overlay Versus Lithium-disilicate Endocrowns for Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.
NCT07508475 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA