Clinical Performance of an Innovative Self-cure Bulk-Fill Composite Compared to Dual-Cure and Light-Cure Bulk-Fill Composite in Posterior Restorations.
NCT07410468 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2026-02-17
Summary
This clinical trial aimed to compare the 1-year clinical performance of a self-cure bulk fill (Stela Capsules), a dual-cure bulk fill (Fill-Up), and a light-cure bulk fill (Tetric N-ceram bulk fill) in class II dental composite restorations
Conditions
- Class II Dental Restorations
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Group I (n=20): were restored with self-cure bulk-fill.
A total of 60 direct class II restorations were divided into three groups: Group I (n=20): were restored with self-cure bulk-fill (Stela capsules) with Stela primer applied using its manufacturer-recommended self-etch adhesive protocol. All restorations were clinically evaluated after 1 week (baseline) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using the Revised FDI World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. Comparisons of FDI criteria between the three groups and across different timepoints within each group were performed using Friedman and post-hoc Bonferroni tests. The significance level was set at p-value \< 0.05.
- OTHER
-
Group II (n=20): were restored with dual-cure bulk-fill.
A total of 60 direct class II restorations were divided into three groups: Group II (n=20): were restored with dual-cure bulk-fill (Fill-up) with ParaBond adhesive system applied using its manufacturer-recommended self-etch adhesive protocol. All restorations were clinically evaluated after 1 week (baseline) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using the Revised FDI World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. Comparisons of FDI criteria between the three groups and across different timepoints within each group were performed using Friedman and post-hoc Bonferroni tests. The significance level was set at p-value \< 0.05.
- OTHER
-
Group III (n=20): were restored with light-cure bulk-fill.
A total of 60 direct class II restorations were divided into three groups: Group III (n=20): were restored with light-cure bulk-fill (Tetric N-ceram bulk fill) with Tetric N-ceram universal adhesive. Each material was applied using its manufacturer-recommended self-etch adhesive protocol. All restorations were clinically evaluated after 1 week (baseline) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using the Revised FDI World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. Comparisons of FDI criteria between the three groups and across different timepoints within each group were performed using Friedman and post-hoc Bonferroni tests. The significance level was set at p-value \< 0.05.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Marwan Abdelnaser
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-02-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-02-10
- Completion
- 2026-02-10
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT04686422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Curing Times and Intensitis
NCT05334901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria
NCT02891967 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Dentin Replacement Materials
NCT07320885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Performance of Two Different Curing Modes in the Direct Filling Therapy in Deciduous Teeth
NCT07212660 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Extensive Direct Composite Restorations With Polyethylene Fiber
NCT04612543 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill Restorative and Nano-fill Resin Composite
NCT04320576 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative in Class I and II Restorations
NCT03764059 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Aging on Micro-tensile Bond Strength and Color Stability of Self-adhesive Resin Composite
NCT06463574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations
NCT06956651 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetics of Dental Composite and Adhesive System
NCT03716349 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Composites With Incrementally Layered Conventional Composites
NCT07078110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System
NCT03343184 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Nusmile Bioflex Versus Stainless-Steel Crowns in Restoring Decayed Primary Molars with Modified Hall Technique
NCT06721741 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Thermoviscous Bulk Fill Resin Composites in Comparison to Conventional Packable Bulk Fills
NCT05276154 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Composite Coronal Build -Up in Mutilated Primary Incisors: 3 Years Results
NCT04758221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA