Comparison of Single-Layer and Triple-Layer TPU MaxFlex Aligners After Intraoral Use
NCT07566533 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 66
Last updated 2026-05-05
Summary
This study aims to compare two types of clear orthodontic aligner materials used in dental treatment: single-layer and triple-layer thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) aligners (MaxFlex). Clear aligners are commonly used to straighten teeth and are preferred for their comfort and aesthetic appearance.
Participants will be provided with aligners and instructed to wear them for approximately 22 hours per day for 10 days. The aligners will be collected before use and after the 10-day period. The study will evaluate how the oral environment affects the properties of these materials over time.
Laboratory tests will be conducted to measure mechanical properties such as strength, flexibility, and deformation, as well as to examine surface changes under a microscope. The results of this study may help improve the performance and durability of aligners and contribute to better orthodontic treatment outcomes.
Conditions
- Malocclusion
- Orthodontic Treatment
- Clear Aligner Therapy
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Single-Layer Thermoplastic Polyurethane Aligner
Single-layer thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) clear aligners fabricated from a homogeneous TPU sheet using thermoforming techniques. These aligners are designed to deliver orthodontic forces for tooth movement. Participants will be instructed to wear the aligners intraorally for 10 days for a minimum of 22 hours per day. The aligners will be evaluated before use and after intraoral exposure to assess changes in mechanical properties and surface morphology.
- DEVICE
-
Triple-Layer Thermoplastic Polyurethane Aligner
Triple-layer thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) clear aligners composed of a multilayer structure including a soft inner layer, a rigid intermediate layer, and a flexible outer layer. These aligners are fabricated using thermoforming techniques and are designed to provide improved force delivery and adaptability. Participants will wear the aligners intraorally for 10 days for at least 22 hours per day. Pre- and post-use evaluations will be conducted to assess mechanical properties and surface morphology changes.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-09-13
- Primary Completion
- 2026-03-05
- Completion
- 2026-03-16
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single Aligner Appliance for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults.
NCT04988373 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Colonization in Three Dimensional (3D) Printed Orthodontic Clear Aligners
NCT07143370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Outcome of Safe T Separators and Conventional Elastomeric Separators
NCT07119814 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of One-Step and Two-Step Light Curing of Bonding Agents and Composite in Orthodontics
NCT07491796 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Oral Health Related Quality of Life Changes Between Clear Aligners and Vestibular Fixed Appliances
NCT04866238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Aligners Versus Rapid Maxillary Expansion
NCT04760535 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Clear Aligners and Traditional Fixed Appliances in the Treatment of Four-premolar-extraction Cases
NCT03645356 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flash-free Brackets and Dental Plaque
NCT03187483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of the Lingual Brackets and Labial Brackets in the Leveling Phase
NCT04357067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Investigation Evaluating the Accuracy of the Trimline Design When Treated With SureSmile® Aligners.
NCT07290790 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bond Failure with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Visible Light-cure Composite Bonding Material in Adult Orthodontic Patients - a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06602154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Precision Orthodontics: A Comparison of Custom vs Traditional Bracket Treatment Efficiency
NCT04266769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Self-ligating Mico One and Conventional MBT Brackets Regarding Alignment Efficiency and Pain Experience- a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06895083 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Clear Aligners With Movement Enhancement Techniques
NCT02087163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tooth Discoloration and Chairside Handling Time (Bonding-Debonding) in Flowable Versus Packable Composites for Clear Aligner Bonded Attachments: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07234149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Precision in Brackets Position in Two Indirect Bonding Materials
NCT05483114 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Occlusal Force Distribution in Digital and Conventional Occlusal Splint
NCT06652217 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Changes in Pulpal Blood Flow Between Conventional and Self-ligating Fixed Orthodontic Brackets During Leveling and Alignment Stage
NCT03780764 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Orthodontic Aligning Archwire Materials
NCT04090931 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Maxillary Canine Retraction Rate Among Conventional (Labial) vs Dual (Simultaneous Labial and Palatal) Force Mechanics Using Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
NCT07508384 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints in Dentistry
NCT07236294 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Micro-abrasive Blasting vs Acid Etching of Orthodontic Bracket Bases
NCT04456114 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional and Cu-NiTi Archwires Regarding Clinical Efficiency and Pain Intensity Using Prostaglandin E2 Biomarker During Alignment and Leveling
NCT06653881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances
NCT06944860 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Clinical Application of Innovatedly Made Transpalatal Arch (TPA) From 3D Reconstructed Model and Conventionally Made TPA
NCT03755622 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA