Analysis of Occlusal Force Distribution in Digital and Conventional Occlusal Splint
NCT06652217 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2024-10-22
Summary
Each eligible patient will be randomly into one of two groups:
Group A: The digital splint group, digital splint will be constructed to each patient.
Group B: The conventional splint group, conventional splint will be constructed to each patient.
* For both groups, thorough clinical examination, scaling and root-planning will be done. Patient will receive a motivational oral hygiene program with detailed explanation regarding the study process and outcome expectations.
* A precise history and clinical examination will be done by (F.M) under supervision of Dr S.G.
The digital splint construction method:
* First, complete arch intraoral digital scans of the maxillary and mandibular arches will be performed using the intra oral scanner following the scanning protocol recommended by the manufacturer.
* For inter maxillary relation recording using optical jaw tracking device, step-by-step procedure for tracking and recording the maxillomandibular relationship and mandibular motion by using an optical jaw tracking system will be illustrated to the patient.
* The occlusal device will be designed using a CAD software program.
* The occlusal device will be printed using a 3D printer
* The occlusal device will be finished and polished manually.
The conventional splint construction method:
* The first step is making an impression using a quick-setting addition polyvinyl siloxane impression material. A stone model will be obtained after pouring the impression using extra-hard dental stone.
* In the second visit a face bow transfer and a centric relation record will be utilized to mount the casts on a semi adjustable articulator.
* For centric relation recording, a jig will be made with an incisal plateau from modeling plastic impression compound and the jig will be inserted between the central incisors. To measure centric relation as precisely as possible (by avoiding translational movement in the temporomandibular joint),
* The jig will be adjusted with a scalpel to create a distance of no more than 2 mm between the maxillary and mandibular arches. Then the relation will be recorded using a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane occlusal registration material. The occlusal registrations will be trimmed to the buccal cusp tips to be transferred accurately to the articulator without interference.
* After mounting of the centric relation the protrusive record will be taken and the horizontal condylar angle will be adjusted accordingly.
* The device will be fabricated from clear prosthetic resin. Production followed a standardized protocol with a minimum inter maxillary thickness of 1.5 mm and a buccal extension to 1 mm below the survey line.
* The device will be finished and occlusion will be adjusted on the articulator. outcomes assessment:
1. Occlusal force distribution will be measured using osslusosense.
2. Cost effectiveness will be assessed using the following equation(CE ratio = C/E).
Conditions
- Bruxism
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Digitally manufactured occlusal splint.
digitally manfactured occlusal splint using intra oral scanner and jaw traccking device for data acqusition and 3d printing for manfacturing of the device
- DEVICE
-
conventionally manufactured occlusal splint
the occlusal device will be manufactured conventionally using impression and and anterior deprogramer with bite registeration material for data aquesition and usual construction method using clear acrylic.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2025-05-31
- Completion
- 2025-06-30
More Related Trials
-
Maximum Biting Force of Inject Able Thermoplastic Resin Versus Conventional Resin in Complete Denture Patients
NCT03221361 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of CAD/CAM vs Conventionally Constructed Occlusal Splints in Patients With Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
NCT04591899 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Using Two 3D Printed Occlusal Splints for Patients With Tempromandibular Disorder
NCT04455672 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Using Copper-Nickel-Titanium Versus Nickel-Titanium Arch Wires on Anterior Segment Crowding Alleviation in Group of Adults With Moderate Crowding
NCT04815200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints in Dentistry
NCT07236294 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Pain and Discomfort With Anterior Versus Posterior Builds-up
NCT04105127 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Double-slot Brackets Versus Single-slot Brackets on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT06481761 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Conventional Versus 3D-Designed and Printed Stabilization Splints for Treatment of TMD Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT06781138 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Molar Intrusion in Open Bite Treatment
NCT02865213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular First Molar Distalization
NCT04229797 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Difference Between Pressing and Vacuum Techniques in Fabrication of Orthodontic Aligners in Cases With Spacing: A Cross-sectional Study
NCT06231875 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Occlusal Stabilization Splints Equilibrated by Different Techniques and Their Effect on TMD
NCT04661670 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Bite Force Distribution After Premolars Extraction by Using T-scan Analysis System
NCT07253337 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Printed Orthodontic Molar Distalizer
NCT07191158 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Maxillary Fixation Using Custom Plates on Nasal Buttress Only Via Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Custom Plates on Nasal and Zygomatic Buttresses Via Conventional Approach in Orthognathic Surgeries
NCT07311785 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Self-ligating Brackets Plus Minor Surgery in Treating Crowded Cases of Malocclusion
NCT03647241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficiency of Maxillary Canine Retraction Using Aligners Versus Conventional Brackets in Orthodontic Extraction Cases.
NCT04333836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Assessment of Thickness Changes in 3D-Printed vs. Custom-Made Mouth Guards for Children in Contact Sports
NCT07000435 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Periodontal Status After the Treatment of Palatally Impacted Canines Using Acceleration Procedures
NCT05644678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Type I Collagen Fragments in the GCF and Saliva During OTM
NCT05020431 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pressure Algometry Evaluation of Two Occlusal Splint Designs in Bruxism Management - RCT
NCT04733573 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Changes in Electromyographic Activity in Aligner Treatment of Adult Patients With and Without Nocturnal Bruxism
NCT06343194 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Interceptive Maxillary Expansion to Relief Anterior Crowding in the Mixed Dentition
NCT06187337 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Outcome of Safe T Separators and Conventional Elastomeric Separators
NCT07119814 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA