Comparison of Outcome of Safe T Separators and Conventional Elastomeric Separators
NCT07119814 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 66
Last updated 2025-08-13
Summary
All participants in this study will be provided with information concerning the study's objectives, and benefits associated with participation. Participants will be informed that their involvement in this study presents no potential risks associated with their participation. Written consent will be obtained with appropriate information provided. Demographic data like age, BMI, gender, residence, socio economic status, occupation status, and literacy status will be documented. Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment will be allocated in two groups equally by using the blocked randomization technique. Patients in Group A will undergo safe-T separators i.e initial thickness of Safe-T separators will be 1mm, Patients in Group B will undergo conventional elastomeric separators i.e thickness of elastomeric separators will be 1.2 mm. Separators will be positioned on either side of lower arch, each type of separator will be in sites, resulting in a sites within the lower arch. A separator placement tool will be utilised to position the separators. The comprehensive assessment will be carried out under the supervision of a consultant possessing at least five years of post-fellowship experience. Patient data will be recorded using a predefined structured proforma.
Conditions
- Malocclusion
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Conventional Separators placement
Safe T separators and conventional elastomeric separators will be placed in patients of fixed orthodontic treatment.
- DEVICE
-
Safe T separator
Safe T separators will be placed in patients of fixed orthodontic treatment
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Khyber College of dentistry
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-03-31
- Completion
- 2026-04-15
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction
NCT05656898 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Periodontal Status After the Treatment of Palatally Impacted Canines Using Acceleration Procedures
NCT05644678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding Appliance
NCT05433051 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Anterior Deprogrammers for Reducing Pain and Masticatory Muscles Tension
NCT03180671 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation Of Two Bone-Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization Appliances: Direct Versus Indirect Anchorage
NCT06507319 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lower-Clear-Plate-Based Intermaxillary Traction
NCT06596239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments During Rapid and Slow Maxillary Expansion
NCT04734054 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comprehensive Outcomes of Palatal TSADs Treatment
NCT07311473 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EFFICACY OF TRANSMUCOSAL MINIPLEITE STABILIZATION TECHNIQUE VERSUS INTRA-ARCH WIRE STABILIZATION TECHNIQUE FOR FIXATION OF SAGITTAL & PARA-SAGITTAL TYPES OF PALATAL FRACTURES IN TERMS OF INTRA-ARCH MOLAR DISTANCE & MAXILLO-MANDIBULAR MOLAR RELATION
NCT07274319 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effect of Two Types of Fixed Retainers on the Health of the Gums
NCT01314729 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Orthodontic Retention Protocols
NCT05121220 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Cleft Development at Two Time Points of Canine Retraction
NCT07210762 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Myofunctional Appliances
NCT05371691 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Alignment Efficiency of Three Types of Nickel-titanium Archwires
NCT05676840 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Rigid Versus Non-rigid Indirect Anchorage During Canine Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Study
NCT06554769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Distalization Using Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrews and Zygomatic Miniplates: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04191070 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Discomfort Perceived by a Cohort of Patients Treated With Aligners and Attachments Placed According to Two Different Protocols
NCT06218641 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Modified Functional Appliance With Expander
NCT06116500 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Interceptive Strategies on the Clinical Outcome of Impacted Maxillary Permanent Canines
NCT06374329 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bonded Bite Turbos Were Bonded to Palatal Surfaces of Maxillary Incisors for Sixty Patients With Anterior Deep Overbite to Check Acceptance Rate of Patients to These Bite Turbos.
NCT07143916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bond Failure with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Visible Light-cure Composite Bonding Material in Adult Orthodontic Patients - a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06602154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Different Thickness of Vacuum Formed Retainer (Essix Retainer) During Retention Phase After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT04149366 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Influence of Low Level Laser Therapy on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Associated Pain
NCT05120102 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Different Rapid Orthodontic Expansion Devices
NCT03258411 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Orthodontic Pain Alleviation With Chewing Gum
NCT07210697 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3