MedTrace Logo

Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish Versus Resin Based Sealant

NCT04603573 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 91

Last updated 2021-08-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the present study is determine the cost-effectiveness, clinical-effectiveness, acceptability and adverse effect of resin sealants versus the fluoride varnish for the prevention of dental caries on newly erupted permanent molars.

Conditions

  • Cost Effectiveness

Interventions

DEVICE

fluoride varnish (3M Clinpro White Varnish 5% sodium fluoride )

5% Sodium Fluoride Varnish is a fluoride varnish which is applied to tooth surfaces for sealing dentinal tubules and treatment of hypersensitive teeth. The varnish is applied in a thin layer over the tooth with an applicator brush, and moisture from saliva cures the varnish for adhesion to the tooth surface.

DEVICE

Resin based fissure sealant (3M Clinpro sealant )

teeth will be isolated with coton rolls and saliva ejector then etching for pits and fissure then tooth will be washed then apply resin based fissure sealant on occlusal surface. resin fissure sealant is a more sensitive for saliva.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Years
Max Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-07-10
Primary Completion
2022-08-31
Completion
2022-09-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04603573 on ClinicalTrials.gov