MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Stress Response Evoked by Conventional Versus Videolaryngoscope

NCT07510542 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 124

Last updated 2026-04-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Impact of using video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy technique in terms of improved hemodynamics post intubation and time taken for intubation.

Conditions

  • Laryngoscopy
  • Stress Response
  • Duration

Interventions

DEVICE

Endotracheal Intubation through a Video Laryngoscope (VL)

In this group, endotracheal intubation will be done through a video laryngoscope

DEVICE

Endotracheal Intubation through a Direct Laryngoscope (DL)

In this group, endotracheal intubation will be done through a direct laryngoscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Syed M Abbas · Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-03-05
Primary Completion
2026-09-05
Completion
2026-09-05

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07510542 on ClinicalTrials.gov