Comparison of Prosthetic Complications and Framework Misfit Among Different Cobalt-Chromium Framework Fabrication Techniques

NCT07489027 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 27

Last updated 2026-03-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized clinical study aimed to compare prosthetic complications and framework misfit associated with three different fabrication techniques of cobalt-chromium frameworks-conventional casting, CAD/CAM milling, and selective laser melting (SLM)-used in maxillary and mandibular full-arch implant-supported acrylic screw-retained restorations.

Conditions

  • Prosthesis (Internal) Complications

Interventions

DEVICE

Implant supported prosthesis

All patients received maxillary and mandibular six implants to support a metal acrylic screw retained full-arch prosthesis

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
45 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-01-18
Primary Completion
2024-11-06
Completion
2026-02-15

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07489027 on ClinicalTrials.gov