Direct Trocar Versus Verres Needle Entry at Gynecologic Laparoscopy in Previous Scarred Abdomen: A Randomised Clinical Trial
NCT07473934 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 88
Last updated 2026-03-16
Summary
Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive technique employed for diagnostic and surgical approaches. Minimally invasive technique compared to laparotomy offer the advantages such as reduced hospital stay, lower morbidity, reduced pain, and faster recovery(1). It has become the primary approach for diagnosing and treating gynecological diseases, favored for both benign and malignant conditions involving the uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes, as well as for diagnostic evaluations in cases like chronic pelvic pain and infertility (2).
Access to the abdomen is the main challenge of laparoscopic surgery. To minimize entry-related injuries like, subcutaneous emphysema, gastrointestinal tract perforation, and minor and major vascular injury for creation of pneumoperitoneum. Several techniques, instruments, and approaches have been introduced. Despite widespread awareness of laparoscopic entry guidelines, considerable variation in the techniques was adopted in clinical practice(3) However, the initial step of accessing the abdominal cavity presents inherent challenges, especially in patients with previous cesarean sections, whose abdominal anatomy may be altered by adhesions or scar tissue(4).
Several methods are used for laparoscopic entry. The most common techniques include Veress needle insertion (VNI), direct optical trocar entry, direct trocar insertion (DTI), and the Hasson technique(5).
VNI is the most common method that is used nowadays despite its slow insufflation rates and fatal complications .Veress needle can be introduced periumbilical or in the left hypochondrium. The Palmer's point is a favoured option for periumbilical Veress needle insertion. The point is located 3 cm below the left costal border at the mid-clavicular line. Many studies have found that there are safer and more effective alternate procedures for peritoneal access in patients following abdominal surgery(6).
The DTI technique requires the advancing of the trocar with a blind twisting motion into the peritoneum after the elevation of the anterior abdominal wall with one hand or with towel clamps. If visual inspection with the camera confirms proper placement, pneumoperitoneum is established with the insufflation of a gas. VN requires the insertion and retraction of a spring-loaded needle with an external diameter of 2 mm. When the tip of the needle penetrates through tissues and enters the peritoneal cavity, the inner stylet springs forward. Then, carbon dioxide is insufflated creating a pneumoperitoneum(7).
Conditions
- Gynecologic Laparoscopy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Veress Needle Entry
a stab incision will be made on the selected site for entry (usually transumbilical or umbilical superior crease). The lifting of the abdominal wall will be performed with the non-dominant hand in all cases. The reusable Veress needle fortified with "spring-loaded obturator" will be introduced intraperitoneally at an angle of approximately 90º by the surgeon holding the needle like a dart. The double-click safety test will be employed to verify the precise intraperitoneal location for the needle. This will be followed by attachment of the gas tube to the Veress needle for gas insufflation. Once satisfactory pneumoperitoneum will be realized, the Veress needle will be detached with the subsequent extension of the stab incision to 11 mm incision. The sharp pointed reusable Trocar/cannula will be inserted by rotary movement as described above.
- PROCEDURE
-
Direct Trocar
patient's abdominal wall before the insertion, a transverse or vertical umbilical incision of 1-1.5cm with the scalpel will be made to easily accommodate the first trocar. The trocar will be inserted until it came into contact with the muscular fascia at an angle of 90o. Subsequently, the abdominal wall will be elevated, caudal to the umbilical scar, creating a tent between the parietal peritoneum and the intracavitary structures. The anterior abdominal wall will be adequately elevated by hand, and the trocar will be inserted directly into the abdominal cavity, aiming towards the pelvic hollow. The trocar will be gently inserted into the abdominal cavity at an angle of 45o towards the pelvis, until the click of the security system will be perceived. This indicates the retraction of the blade secondary to the pressure change produced by its entry. There is hissing sound of air gushing in peritoneal cavity will be heard and as air entered the cavity all content fall from the ab
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assiut University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2027-09-30
- Completion
- 2027-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Can 3D Laparoscopy Improve Surgical Performances in Surgeons in Training?
NCT04209036 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Does Intraperitoneal Washout Further Reduce Pain After Low-Pressure vNOTES Hysterectomy?
NCT07467577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating Artisential Laparoscopic Instruments in Gynecologic Surgery
NCT06050161 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pre Operative Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
NCT01075074 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Umbilical Access in Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01350739 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
NCT03548831 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Comparing Adnexal Surgery by vNOTES or Laparoscopy
NCT06964594 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
4K Versus 3D Laparoscopic Colporraphy by Surgeons in Training: a Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT04637022 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT02320565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three Laparoscopic Access Techniques
NCT01597362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Marking Surgical Incision on Patient's Abdomen
NCT01803334 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy In Patients With Early Cervical Cancer
NCT01258413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Fast-track Versus Conventional Recovery Protocol in Laparoscopic Hysterctomy
NCT03828981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Implementation of MinimAlly Invasive Hysterectomy Trial
NCT03617354 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
vNOTES Transvaginal Endoscopic Surgery Versus Laparoscopy
NCT04324034 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Relationship Between Intraperitoneal Drain Placement and Postoperative Pain in Gynecologic Laparoscopy
NCT07109193 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Surgery: Comparison of Conventional Trocars to the Teleflex® MiniLap® System
NCT03726203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevalence and Severity of Surgical Adhesions Among Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery at Women's Health Hospital
NCT05703451 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Does 3D Laparoscopy Improve Vaginal Cuff Suture Time?
NCT02192606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of a Minimally Invasive Approach to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy on Postoperative Recovery
NCT05102032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Combining the Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver with Active Gas Aspiration on Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain in Patients Having a Gynecologic Laparoscopy, Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
NCT06753292 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
BARBED vs. STANDARD Suture for Colporrhaphy at the End of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT05833204 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Laparoscopy in Assessing Resectability of Ovarian Cancer
NCT05564234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-port Access Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT01048931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02059954 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA