BARBED vs. STANDARD Suture for Colporrhaphy at the End of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT05833204 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1614

Last updated 2026-04-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide, with more than 400,000 hysterectomies performed annually in the United States. As a consequence, even uncommon complications can affect large numbers of patients. Among potentially life-threatening events, vaginal cuff dehiscence complicates 0.14-1.38% of procedures, and any vaginal cuff complications (dehiscence, hematoma, bleeding, infection) are estimated to affect 4.7-9.8% of patients. In this scenario, any preventive strategy can provide clinically relevant benefits. Regarding colporrhaphy, only the adoption of a laparoscopic approach instead of a vaginal approach is supported by high-quality evidence. Our group demonstrated that the laparoscopic closure of the vaginal cuff after total laparoscopic hysterectomy reduces the incidence of vaginal cuff complications.

Among other potentially effective interventions, the use of barbed sutures was associated with a lower incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence than the standard suture. In a recent meta-analysis, the use of barbed sutures has been associated with a pooled incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence of 0.4% versus 2% after a traditional vaginal suture. However, this evidence is limited because most pooled studies were retrospective, and only two were randomized controlled trials. Moreover, these two randomized controlled trials had a very small sample size and were not powered to detect clinically relevant differences. On that basis, despite the promising utility of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the choice of the type of suture is not evidence-based but still guided by personal opinions, as well as by the preference and habits of the operators.

Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether the laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure with barbed suture determines a lower incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence and complications than conventional sutures after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Conditions

  • Vaginal Cuff Complications

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic colporrhaphy with 0-caliber barbed absorbable suture

After the total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the colporrhaphy will be performed using a 0-caliber barbed absorbable suture (V-Loc ™, Covidien, Medtronic)

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic colporrhaphy with standard 0-caliber absorbable suture

After the total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the colporrhaphy will be performed using a 0-caliber absorbable suture made of a coated braided thread (Vicryl; Ethicon Inc, Sommerville, NJ)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universita di Verona

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Stefano Uccella, MD, PhD · Universita di Verona

  • Simone Garzon, MD · Universita di Verona

  • Pier Carlo Zorzato, MD · Universita di Verona

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-09-01
Primary Completion
2028-12-31
Completion
2028-12-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05833204 on ClinicalTrials.gov