Laparoscopic Surgery: Comparison of Conventional Trocars to the Teleflex® MiniLap® System
NCT03726203 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2021-04-29
Summary
During laparoscopy, trocars are essential: they allow the passage of instruments through the wall. In gynecology, with exception, trocars 5mm (used for the passage of endo-scissors and forceps) and 10 to 12mm are used (especially for optics).
Trocars are responsible for complications, such as vascular wounds, digestive wounds, pain, infections or postoperative hernias, or aesthetic sequelae, and should be chosen with caution: most complications of laparoscopy are essentially due to their placement, and the complications at the introduction of the first trocar are the most frequent.
The MiniLap® system developed by Teleflex does not require trocars in the case of a single forceps, or a single 5mm trocar with the necessary forceps change (this is the Percuvance® system). The aim of the latter is to make minimally invasive surgery even less invasive, thanks to a reduction in the number of trocars used (in many cases, elimination of two trocars), smaller incisions (percutaneous use of instruments, with a diameter of 2,4mm) thus reducing the complications
Conditions
- Gynecologic Surgeries
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
laparoscopic gynecologic surgery with the MiniLap System.
Subjects participating in the study will undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery as planned in the routine care, but using the MiniLap System instead of the conventional single-use trocars used usually.
- DEVICE
-
laparoscopic gynecologic surgery with the conventional single-use trocars.
Subjects participating in the study will undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery as planned in the routine care using the conventional single-use trocars used usually.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Teleflex
collaborator INDUSTRY -
University Hospital, Lille
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Chrystelle Rubod, MD,PhD · University Hospital, Lille
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-15
- Primary Completion
- 2021-04-27
- Completion
- 2021-04-27
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN TERNAMIAN BLADELESS TROCAR ENTRY and VISUAL TRANSPARENT BLADED TROCAR ENTRY in LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURES
NCT06645392 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study Designed to Assess the Safety and Feasibility of the Levita Magnetic Surgical System in Laparoscopic Gynecological Procedures
NCT06743256 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Trocar Entry Versus Veress Needle Entry in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
NCT01955798 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complications Associated With Promontofixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic and Non-robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
NCT01320215 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
2-D and 3-D Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02610985 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pre Operative Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
NCT01075074 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Umbilical Access in Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01350739 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three Laparoscopic Access Techniques
NCT01597362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
NCT03548831 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Retrospective Review of Enseal Laparoscopic Vaginal Assisted Hysterectomy (LAVH) Versus Traditional LAVH
NCT01217866 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Prospective Data Collection in Connection With Two Different Treatment Methods: Robotic Assisted Laparoscopy and Conventional Laparoscopy
NCT03861195 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer
NCT00614211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03722563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of a Minimally Invasive Approach to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy on Postoperative Recovery
NCT05102032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy In Patients With Early Cervical Cancer
NCT01258413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Shull Suspension Comparison Trial
NCT05856201 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Combining the Pulmonary Recruitment Maneuver with Active Gas Aspiration on Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain in Patients Having a Gynecologic Laparoscopy, Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
NCT06753292 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Multi-centre Study to Assess the Safety and Manageability of a Laparoscopic Adhesion Barrier in Women Undergoing Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery Followed by Second Look Laparoscopy
NCT02260115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
vNOTES Transvaginal Endoscopic Surgery Versus Laparoscopy
NCT04324034 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Robot-assisted(Da Vinci®)Laparoscopic Interventions for Hysterectomy
NCT00683293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications
NCT05960292 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
AMBULAPSE STUDY Feasibility Study on Laparoscopic Double-mesh Sacrocolpopexy With or Without Robotic Assistance, in Female Patients Presenting With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Based on an Outpatient Treatment Model.
NCT03764852 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Minilap Hysterectomy
NCT03251677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Trans-vaginal Repair for Anterior Rectocele.
NCT06633172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Harmonic ACE®+7 Shears in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02278640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4