Three Laparoscopic Access Techniques
NCT01597362 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 608
Last updated 2012-05-14
Summary
The study compares the Veress needle technique, the Direct trocar insertion and the Open technique with each other, in terms of minor complications, in elective laparoscopic procedures for benign pathologies.
Conditions
- Benign Gynecological Pathology
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
laparoscopy
Trocar access in laparoscopy
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopy
The angle of the Veress needle insertion is 45 for non-obese women. After insertion of the needle, tests to determinate its correct positioning are: the double click test, the aspiration test, the handing drop test, serial intrabdominal gas pressure measurements. The volume of CO2 inserted with the Veress needle depends on the intra-abdominal pressure. Adequate pneumoperitoneum should is determined by a pressure of 20 to 30 mm Hg and not by predetermined CO2 volume.
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopy
Direct insertion of the trocar is performed without prior pneumoperitoneum. Infra-umbilical skin incision is wide enough to accomodate the diameter of a sharp trocar/cannual system. The abdominal wall is elevated by pulling on, by hands, two towel clips placed 3 cm on either side of the umbilicus, and the trocar is inserted at a 90°angle. On removal of the sharp trocar, the laparoscope is inserted to confirm the presence of omentum or bowel in the visual field.
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopy
A small incision, 1 cm long, is made through the skin of the lower edge of the umbilical fossa. The skin and the subcutaneous adipose tissues are retracted with the Zimmerman dissectors. The anterior rectus fascia is incised with the scalpel. The dissection with the Zimmerman valves allows the exposure of the peritoneum. After the peritoneum is incised, the trocar is inserted under direct vision. The laparoscope is introduced and insufflation is started. At the end of the procedure the fascial defect is closed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Campus Bio-Medico University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2006-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2010-05-31
- Completion
- 2010-09-30
More Related Trials
-
Laparoscopic Surgery: Comparison of Conventional Trocars to the Teleflex® MiniLap® System
NCT03726203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
4K Versus 3D Total Laparoscopic Bilateral Oophorectomy: Tools in Comparison
NCT06750003 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopy-assisted Ovarian Cystectomy: NEW APPROCH
NCT03370952 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety of Direct Laparoscopic Introduction: Retrospective Observational Study at the University Hospital of Strasbourg
NCT05858554 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications
NCT05960292 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility and Benefit of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Less Than 3 Millimeter Diameter's Instruments in Current Practice
NCT02367703 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Uterine Artery Ligation at Origin in Total Laparscopic Hystrectomy
NCT04808583 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Ultrasound Examination: Analysis of Feasibility
NCT06278636 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
vNOTES Transvaginal Endoscopic Surgery Versus Laparoscopy
NCT04324034 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Gynecology Curriculum for Residents
NCT01916343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Three Robotic Platforms for Hysterectomy
NCT06138197 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
NCT03548831 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic vs Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Disease
NCT03692832 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hysterectomy by Transabdominal Laparoscopy or NOTES
NCT02631837 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Closure of the Uterine Artery at Its Origin vs at the Cervix: a Randomized Trial
NCT04156932 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transverse vs Longitudinal Incision in Myomectomy
NCT03009812 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
4K Versus 3D Laparoscopic Colporraphy by Surgeons in Training: a Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT04637022 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Systematic Approach for Cold Knife Morcellation of Large Uterus in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT07330102 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. Transvaginal Cuff Closure
NCT02453165 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between 2 Techniques for Bilateral Salpingectomy
NCT03788421 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Transvaginal Closure of the Vaginal Vault After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT06867614 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy In Patients With Early Cervical Cancer
NCT01258413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Minilap Hysterectomy
NCT03251677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of a Minimally Invasive Approach to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy on Postoperative Recovery
NCT05102032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Low Impact Laparoscopy Concept Versus Conventional Laparoscopy
NCT04165148 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA