Artificial Intelligence-Guided Versus Manual CBCT Planning for Immediate Implant Placement
NCT07459036 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2026-03-09
Summary
This study evaluates whether artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans can support clinical decision-making for immediate dental implant placement in molar extraction sites.
When a molar tooth is removed, placing a dental implant immediately may reduce treatment time and preserve surrounding bone. However, immediate implant placement is not always possible and depends on the anatomy of the extraction socket, particularly the interradicular septum (the bone between the roots). CBCT imaging is routinely used to assess this anatomy before surgery. Traditionally, radiologists manually evaluate these scans. Recently, AI-based tools have been developed to automatically analyze CBCT images.
In this randomized controlled trial, patients requiring molar extraction and potential immediate implant placement will be assigned to one of two planning approaches: AI-guided CBCT assessment or conventional manual CBCT assessment. The operating surgeon will use the assigned planning report to guide treatment decisions.
The primary outcome of the study is the feasibility of immediate implant placement, defined as successful implant placement with achievement of primary stability during surgery. Secondary outcomes include surgical time, need for changes to the treatment plan, and implant stability measurements.
The goal of this study is to determine whether AI-assisted CBCT analysis performs similarly to, or improves upon, conventional manual radiologic assessment in supporting safe and effective immediate implant placement.
Conditions
- Dental Implant
- Immediate Implant
- Guided Bone Regeneration
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
AI assisted CBCt
The intervention consists of a fully automated, deep learning-based CBCT analysis pipeline designed for extraction socket segmentation and quantitative interradicular septum assessment. The AI system utilizes a pre-trained convolutional neural network architecture to perform voxel-level segmentation of the extraction socket and surrounding alveolar structures on CBCT datasets. Following segmentation, the model automatically quantifies predefined anatomical parameters, including interradicular septum width at standardized reference levels and socket morphology classification. These measurements are generated using algorithmically defined geometric landmarks, ensuring consistent spatial reference across cases. Feasibility for immediate implant placement is determined using a prespecified, protocol-defined decision rule applied to AI-derived quantitative parameters.
- PROCEDURE
-
Manual CBCT segmentation
The control intervention consists of conventional radiologic evaluation of CBCT datasets using manual segmentation and operator-driven anatomical assessment. CBCT scans will be reviewed by an experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologist using standard imaging software. Interradicular septum dimensions will be determined through manual identification of anatomical landmarks and measurement using software-based calipers at predefined reference levels. Socket morphology classification will be assigned based on visual interpretation and application of the same predefined anatomical criteria specified in the study protocol. Feasibility for immediate implant placement will be determined by applying the protocol-defined decision thresholds to manually obtained measurements. All measurements and classifications will be documented in a structured planning report provided to the operating surgeon. Unlike the AI-guided intervention, this workflow relies on manual landmark identification and ope
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Shalash Dental education
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mahmoud Shalash, PhD · Shalash Implant education
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 99 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-03-03
- Primary Completion
- 2026-04-02
- Completion
- 2026-05-02
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Artificial Intelligence Versus Conventional Digital Design for Fixed Dental Prosthesis
NCT07432165 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Osseodensefication Technique Versus Conventional Implant Drilling Technique in Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06590753 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
CBCT-Based Safety Distance for Implant Placement Near the Inferior Alveolar Canal
NCT07363239 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
"Osseodensification Efficacy on Molar Septum Expansion in Immediate Molar Implant Placement
NCT07108361 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Volume Changes in Immediate Implant Placement Using Allograft Versus Xenograft in Mandibular Molars
NCT06962878 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Implant Planning Software
NCT06693635 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Custom-Made Registration Method for Dynamic Navigation Implant Surgery Using Mininavident in the Esthetic Zone: A Clinical Trial
NCT07199153 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusion and Disocclusion Time in Immediately Loaded Overdentures Supported by Two Splinted Versus Non Splinted Interforaminal Implants
NCT06376019 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Integration of Facial , Intraoral Scanning and CBCT on Patient Satisfaction and Occlusion of Temporary, Permanent Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06846372 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Functional Versus Non Functional Implant Loading in the Mandible
NCT04521530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Implant Supported Overdenture on Changes of Electromyographic and Brain Activity
NCT05493579 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Immediate Implant Stability When Adding Mixture of Hyaluronic Acid and Melatonin
NCT03692026 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Jumping Gap Dimension at Maxillary Teeth: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Study
NCT04636385 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of Digital Versus Static Jaw Relation Record on Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants Supporting Maxillary Single Overdenture
NCT06965517 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anterior Mandibular Region for Immediate Implant Placement
NCT06527950 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Fully Versus Partially Guided Implants Placement: Measurement of Accuracy of Implant Position and Passivity of Superstructures.
NCT07174791 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs Conventional Prosthetic Rehab & Occlusal Analysis in Edentulous Patients
NCT07164066 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Passivity of Full-Arch Co-Cr Maxillary Prostheses Using IOS
NCT07370701 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Fully Guided Versus Half Guided Implant
NCT06542562 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Validation of the Jawbone Anatomy Classification in Endosseous Dental Implant Treatment
NCT02054676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Shield Technique Versus Conventional Immediate Implant Placement in Thin Buccofacial Bone
NCT03264053 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
NCT01801566 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Intraoral Scan Post-processing Methods: A Clinical Trial
NCT07295964 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of an AI-Based Chatbot on Implant Patient Management: RCT
NCT07300657 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Versus Neutral-Zone CAD/CAM Dentures Restoring Mandibular Resorbed Ridges
NCT05895292 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA