Validation of the Jawbone Anatomy Classification in Endosseous Dental Implant Treatment
NCT02054676 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2016-03-02
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate validation and clinical assessment of the earlier proposed clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone anatomy in endosseous dental implant treatment.
Expected results.
* high accuracy of proposed classification for proper implantation risk degree evaluation.
* the proposed classification system based on anatomical and radiological jawbone quantity and quality evaluation will be a helpful tool for planning of treatment strategy and collaboration among specialists.
* good interobserver reliability of clinical and radiological edentulous jaw segment evaluation.
* good reliability between radiological and intraoperative investigations and postoperative data.
Conditions
- Partially Edentulous Jaw
Interventions
- RADIATION
-
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography preoperative evaluation.
Procedure: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) preoperative evaluation (e.g. "i-CAT", Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, Pennsylvania, USA). CBCT voxel size is about 0,2 - 0,25 mm . Manufacturer recommended software is used. CBCT evaluation of partially edentulous jaw segments are made during preoperative stage (see Appendix 1): * Non aesthetic and aesthetic zone edentulous jaw segment parameters (height, width, length, mandibular canal walls identification/jawbone quality type visual identification) evaluation; * Every edentulous jaw segment parameter should be graded following: Type I (low risk), Type II (moderate risk), Type III (high risk). All graded measurements provide overall risk evaluation for implant treatment in non aesthetic and aesthetic zone without aesthetic parameters evaluation. Dental implant is selected if surgery is possible.
- PROCEDURE
-
Intraoperative edentulous jaw segment parameters evaluation.
Surgery is planned preliminary according to preoperative stage edentulous jaw segment evaluation results. Intervention related study parameters are provided on Appendix 2. Aesthetic parameters related to implant treatment success are evaluated after mucoperiosteal flap elevation: alveolar ridge vertical position, mesial and distal interproximal bone peak height (in the aesthetic zone). The additional parameters (non aesthetic) are evaluated after dental implant osteotomy preparation and implant placement: * implant drill slippage deeper than planned; * implant threads coverage; * etc.
- DEVICE
-
Endosseous dental implant placement.
Endosseous dental implant (e.g. "Bone Level SLA" implant, Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) is placed if possible during intraoperative stage according to study protocol in the aesthetic or non aesthetic zone edentulous jaw segment. Optimally positioned dental implant is surrounded by at least 1 mm of bone for successful treatment outcome in the non aesthetic zone. Aesthetic zone implant is placed in the optimal three dimensional position. It is surrounded by bone at least 1 mm from lingual side and at least 2 mm from buccal side for successful treatment outcome. Dental implant apex is at least 2 mm away from anatomically important jaw vital structures. Dental implant parameters (length, width) are individual (depends on edentulous jaw segment parameters). Bone and soft tissue augmentation are made if necessary after dental implant placement.
- RADIATION
-
Dental implant position evaluation.
Periapical radiograph (e.g. "Kodak RVG 6100 Intraoral Digital Imaging System", Carestream Health, Rochester, NY) evaluation is necessary (Appendix 2) to examine implant apex distance to anatomically important vital structures (possible injury) (mandibular canal, nose base) during early postoperative stage. Digital periapical radiographs are used to assess the edentulous jaw segment after implant placement. The long cone paralleling technique should be used for taking periapical X-ray (prevention of possible creation of foreshortening and elongation). Postoperative patient's neurosensory evaluation is necessary to assess possible inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve injury. After finishing of local anaesthesia patient should be contacted and if there are some sensory deficit complains, patient should be examined.
- DRUG
-
Medications.
Patients will be given amoxicillin 500mg for every 8 hours or clindamycin 300mg for every 8 hours for 7 - 10 days after surgery. Patients will be given Ibuprofen 600mg every 12 hours for pain relief following surgery at least for first three days as needed. Patients will be given chlorhexidine 0,12% mouth rinse at least every 8 hours starting 24 hours after surgery for 14 days.
- PROCEDURE
-
Late postoperative soft tissue evaluation.
Mesial and distal papillae appearance, vertical soft tissue deficiency (Appendix 3) evaluation during late postoperative stage is necessary for classification accuracy assessment during final single-tooth implant crown placement in the region of aesthetic zone (both parameters are evaluated) and non aesthetic zone (soft tissue vertical deficiency) edentulous jaw segment. The time after surgery is case depending before provisional and final crown placement. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning is recommended with screw retained provisional single-tooth implant crown for approximately 4 - 8 weeks. Healing abutment placement after dental implant osseointegration is not recommended because of the treatment time saving.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidad de Granada
collaborator OTHER -
Hacettepe University
collaborator OTHER -
University of Messina
collaborator OTHER - collaborator OTHER
-
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Gintaras Juodzbalys, DDS,PhD · Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
-
Hom-Lay Wang, DDS,MSD,PhD · University of Michigan
-
Marco Cicciu, DDS,MSc,PhD · University of Messina
-
Pablo Galindo Moreno, DDS, PhD · Universidad de Granada
-
Tolga Fikret Tosum, DDS, PhD · Hacettepe University
-
Marius Kubilius, DDS · Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
-
Inmaculada Ortega Oller, DDS · Universidad de Granada
-
Yagmur Deniz Ilarslan, DDS · Hacettepe University
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2016-04-30
- Completion
- 2016-04-30
Countries
- Lithuania
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Two Different CBCT-derived Templates
NCT02772172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Digital Versus Static Jaw Relation Record on Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants Supporting Maxillary Single Overdenture
NCT06965517 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Loading With Provisional Prosthetic Restoration by Means of One Abutment at One Time and Temporary Abutment
NCT05668494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Association Between Restorative Emergence Profiles and Peri-implant Bone Loss in Different Implant Systems:
NCT06544746 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Jumping Gap Dimension at Maxillary Teeth: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Study
NCT04636385 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Vascular and Neural Elements Located in the Symphyseal Region Before Implant Surgery
NCT05667389 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Study to Evaluate Bone and Gum Dimension Changes Around Dental Implants Placed in Different Positions in Bone.
NCT01759537 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysising the Marginal Bone Loss, Torque and Implant Stability Placed in Bone and Tissue Level Dental Implants
NCT07288606 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Connective Tissue Graft Versus Collagen Matrix
NCT04210596 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant in Posterior Mandible Region
NCT07027904 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone
NCT01533571 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
An Observational Clinical Study of the T3 Dental Implant System
NCT05062863 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Timing of Soft Tissue Grafting Following Immediate Implant Placement
NCT05537545 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Morphological Characteristics of Anterior Maxillary Bone and Dynamic Navigation in Full-Arch Implant Placement
NCT06974253 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement
NCT02814149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Changes Following Immediate Implant Placement in Molar Extraction Sockets With or Without Bone Graft
NCT06207617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Functional Versus Non Functional Implant Loading in the Mandible
NCT04521530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Dimensional Changes at Different Implant-to-abutment Connections: a 1-year Clinical and Radiological Study
NCT01807416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Labial Bone Thickness Around Immediate Implants in the Esthetic Zone Following a Novel Socket Evaluation System
NCT06648135 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Associated Factors Around Ziacom Dental Implants With Different Prosthetic Connection
NCT05859113 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Implant Placement for Patients With Mandibular Reconstruction Using Dynamic Navigation and Static Guides
NCT06250907 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Crestal Bone Changes Following Equi-crestal Versus Subcrestal Implant Placement
NCT06760442 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation
NCT03357406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Insertion Protocol of Convergent Transmucosal Design Implants
NCT06254885 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Expectation and Satisfaction of Implant Rehab After Jaw Surgery
NCT04873635 ·Status: COMPLETED