"Osseodensification Efficacy on Molar Septum Expansion in Immediate Molar Implant Placement
NCT07108361 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2025-08-11
Summary
The ideal positioning of immediate implants in molar extraction sockets often requires the osteotomy to be in the interradicular septum, which can be challenging in some cases, with traditional site preparation techniques. Also, the alveolar ridge undergoes various remodeling processes following tooth extraction, resulting in hard and soft tissue loss which complicates prosthodontic rehabilitation. Immediate implant placement help preserve the alveolar ridge dimensions and buccal ridge contour. While osseodensification has shown promise in enhancing primary stability and bone microarchitecture, its clinical and microstructural effects in molar extraction sockets remain underexplored. Although there is ample documentation of information on the temperature that is generated during preparation of implant sites, there are no studies available in the literature comparing conventional drilling and osseodensification techniques; therefore, the present investigation was aimed at analyzing the efficacy of osseodensification compared to conventional drilling in terms of bone dimensions preservation , changes in bone architecture during implant site preparation and heat generation to define which technique can be safely applied to achieve the necessary implant primary stability without damaging the surrounding bone.
Aim of the study:
Is to compare the molar septum dimensions using osseodensification expansion versus the conventional drilling protocol and to assess the role of jumping gap grafting in preservation of the alveolar ridge dimensions and buccal ridge contour in addition to Evaluation of the effect of osseodensification on the bony micro-architecture and heat generation
Conditions
- Implant Osseointegration
- Implant Osteotomy
- Implant Placement
- Implant Primary Stability
- Molar Extraction Socket
- Immediate Implant Placement
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Osseodensification
Septum width will be directly measured post molar extraction confirming the premeasure of the CBCT. Measurement will be recorded at the narrowest width of the septum. Implant site preparation starts with a pilot drill, in clockwise motion, in the center of the septum, until 1 mm deeper than the planned implant length. Densah® Burs (Versah, LLC, Jackson, MI, USA) were then sequentially used in OD mode (counterclockwise, drilling speed 800-1500 rpm, with copious irrigation) in small increments to gradually expand the osteotomy, until reaching the desired width for the planned implant diameter, Osteotomy diameter as a reflection of septum width expansion will then be directly measured and recorded after site instrumentation. Implants of adequate diameter (4, 4.5, or 5mm) and length (selected using preoperative CBCT) will be inserted in the prepared osteotomies to engage the bone apical to the socket, insertion torque will be measured using the torque wrench and ISQ values
- PROCEDURE
-
conventional drilling
Septum width will be directly measured post molar extraction confirming the premeasure of the CBCT. Measurement will be recorded at the narrowest width of the septum. The initial (pointed) drill will be used to make a hole (starting point) in the interradicular bone to avoid slippage of the subsequent the drills in the socket of the remaining roots. The drills of increasing diameters will be used to complete the implant osteotomy according to manufacturer instructions. In case of limited interradicular bone volume, drilling will be made at the socket of mesial or distal roots. Osteotomy diameter as a reflection of septum width expansion will then be directly measured and recorded after site instrumentation. Implants of adequate diameter (4, 4.5, or 5mm) and length (selected using preoperative CBCT) will be inserted in the prepared osteotomies to engage the bone apical to the socket insertion torque will be measured using the torque wrench and ISQ values
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Augusta University
collaborator OTHER -
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2027-09-30
- Completion
- 2028-09-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement
NCT07077915 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Osseodensefication Technique Versus Conventional Implant Drilling Technique in Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06590753 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Implant Site
NCT04189718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dental Implant Stability Placed in Healed Bony Sites Using Oversized Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Protocol
NCT06917638 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation
NCT03357406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Sealing Socket Abutment Technique With Immediate Implant in the Mandibular Molars
NCT03667261 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Dehiscence Using Autogenous Tooth Plate
NCT06313216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods
NCT05390996 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sockets and Delayed Implants in Healed Sockets.
NCT04346706 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Changes Following Immediate Implant Placement in Molar Extraction Sockets With or Without Bone Graft
NCT06207617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Osseodensification on the Peri-implant Condition
NCT06689969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone
NCT01533571 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Stability of Immediate Implant Using Versah Versus Conventional Burs
NCT05960916 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Osseodensification and Dental Implant Stability
NCT05376020 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Osseodensification on Implant Stability in Posterior Maxilla
NCT04442763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling on the Stability of Tapered and Cylindrical Implants.
NCT07244185 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol
NCT06992557 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Implant Site Preparation With Three Different Drilling Systems in Posterior Maxilla (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
NCT07068750 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Multiple Adjacent Extraction Sockets
NCT07063836 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling for Implant Site Preparation
NCT06034067 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Site Preparation With Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drills in Terms of Operation Time, Implant Stability and Bone Density
NCT05512273 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Immediate Implant Stability When Adding Mixture of Hyaluronic Acid and Melatonin
NCT03692026 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Occlusal Balance Effect on Mandibular Bone Density by Using Fractal Analysis in Complete Denture Patients (Split-Mouth Study)
NCT06320704 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Evaluation Of Dental Implants Stability Placed In Healed Bony Sites Following Over-drilling Compared To Conventional-Drilling Protocol
NCT03250949 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Abutment Angulation on Implant Failure in Immediately Placed and Restored Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using Computer Aided Surgical Guides: RCT
NCT03243695 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA